Variations and trends in major research topics across leading general medical journals, 1966–2022

Attention to publication diversity calls for broader topic inclusion by journals. Although general medical journals have distinct editorial policies, cross-journal differences remain underexplored. To compare trends of major research topics of clinical trials among leading general medical journals indexed in PubMed. A meta-research study was conducted for clinical trials in Lancet, NEJM, JAMA and BMJ from 1966 to 2022. Clinical trial numbers and their associated MeSH major topic categories were compared among journals, analyzing annual trends. We employed the Cochran-Armitage test for trend analysis. We discovered a total of 18925, 13899, 8630, and 5429 MeSH major topic categories from 7377, 5302, 2785, and 1853 published clinical trials in Lancet, NEJM, JAMA, and BMJ, respectively. Notable variations in topics were observed in 14 out of 19 MeSH major topic categories. Lancet and NEJM published approximately 30% of their clinical trials in the Chemicals and Drugs category and Disease category, surpassing JAMA’s percentages of 22.5% and 27.7%, and BMJ’s 14.0 and 25.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In contrast, NEJM published 3.1% of its clinical trials in the Health Care category, which was lower than Lancet’s 4.5%, JAMA’s 6.8%, and BMJ’s 12.9% (p < 0.0001). There were distinct publication trends between NEJM and Lancet in seven MeSH major topic categories (p for trend < 0.0001). The topic mix of clinical trials differs systematically across four leading general medical journals from 1966 to 2022. These differences likely shape what evidence readers encounter in education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2594711
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variations and trends in major research topics across leading general medical journals, 1966–2022

Nin‐Chieh Hsu, Yasuharu Tokuda, Chia‐Hao Hsu, Charles Liao
Critical Public Health
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Variations and trends in major research topics across leading general medical journals, 1966–2022

Nin‐Chieh Hsu, Yasuharu Tokuda, Chia‐Hao Hsu, Charles Liao
article en

Abstract

Attention to publication diversity calls for broader topic inclusion by journals. Although general medical journals have distinct editorial policies, cross-journal differences remain underexplored. To compare trends of major research topics of clinical trials among leading general medical journals indexed in PubMed. A meta-research study was conducted for clinical trials in Lancet, NEJM, JAMA and BMJ from 1966 to 2022. Clinical trial numbers and their associated MeSH major topic categories were compared among journals, analyzing annual trends. We employed the Cochran-Armitage test for trend analysis. We discovered a total of 18925, 13899, 8630, and 5429 MeSH major topic categories from 7377, 5302, 2785, and 1853 published clinical trials in Lancet, NEJM, JAMA, and BMJ, respectively. Notable variations in topics were observed in 14 out of 19 MeSH major topic categories. Lancet and NEJM published approximately 30% of their clinical trials in the Chemicals and Drugs category and Disease category, surpassing JAMA’s percentages of 22.5% and 27.7%, and BMJ’s 14.0 and 25.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In contrast, NEJM published 3.1% of its clinical trials in the Health Care category, which was lower than Lancet’s 4.5%, JAMA’s 6.8%, and BMJ’s 12.9% (p < 0.0001). There were distinct publication trends between NEJM and Lancet in seven MeSH major topic categories (p for trend < 0.0001). The topic mix of clinical trials differs systematically across four leading general medical journals from 1966 to 2022. These differences likely shape what evidence readers encounter in education.

Critical Public HealthVol. 35(1)
Kaohsiung Medical University (TW), National Taiwan University (TW), Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (TW), Okinawa Red Cross Hospital (JP), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.