From <scp>ESG</scp> Disclosure to Financial Impact: Unpacking the Role of <scp>SDG</scp> Alignment and Lag Effect in <scp>ICT</scp> Firms

ABSTRACT This study develops an integrated framework explaining how ESG reporting, when aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), influences firm performance over time. Moving beyond static or symbolic interpretations, it conceptualizes ESG–SDG alignment as a strategic, institutional, and capability‐building process through which firms embed sustainability principles into strategy, governance, and operations. By combining BERTopic and long short‐term memory (LSTM) models, this analysis captures both the semantic content and temporal dynamics of ESG disclosures, addressing persistent limitations in traditional ESG ratings that neglect narrative quality and lagged financial effects. Empirical evidence from 205 publicly listed Taiwanese ICT firms shows that ESG topics aligned with SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), specifically water resource management, carbon emissions reduction, and digital transformation, exhibit significant positive associations with firm earnings. Firms that disclose deeper, sector‐relevant, and credible sustainability commitments demonstrate stronger and more consistent financial performance, underscoring that narrative depth and thematic relevance matter more than disclosure volume. Theoretically, the study unites stakeholder, institutional, sustainability accounting, impact measurement, and dynamic capabilities perspectives to explain how ESG reporting converts external legitimacy pressures into internal adaptive capacity and long‐term value creation. Practically, it highlights the importance of linking ESG disclosures to measurable SDG targets and using real‐time sustainability indicators to enhance transparency. Overall, the research advances a temporally sensitive and impact‐oriented understanding of ESG reporting as both a semantic construct and an adaptive process that builds trust, strengthens governance, and generates sustained financial and societal value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70284
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From ESG Disclosure to Financial Impact: Unpacking the Role of SDG Alignment and Lag Effect in ICT Firms

Tai‐Hsi Wu, Ling‐Jing Kao, Yongzhao Lin, Chih‐Chou Chiu
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

From ESG Disclosure to Financial Impact: Unpacking the Role of SDG Alignment and Lag Effect in ICT Firms

Tai‐Hsi Wu, Ling‐Jing Kao, Yongzhao Lin, Chih‐Chou Chiu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study develops an integrated framework explaining how ESG reporting, when aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), influences firm performance over time. Moving beyond static or symbolic interpretations, it conceptualizes ESG–SDG alignment as a strategic, institutional, and capability‐building process through which firms embed sustainability principles into strategy, governance, and operations. By combining BERTopic and long short‐term memory (LSTM) models, this analysis captures both the semantic content and temporal dynamics of ESG disclosures, addressing persistent limitations in traditional ESG ratings that neglect narrative quality and lagged financial effects. Empirical evidence from 205 publicly listed Taiwanese ICT firms shows that ESG topics aligned with SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), specifically water resource management, carbon emissions reduction, and digital transformation, exhibit significant positive associations with firm earnings. Firms that disclose deeper, sector‐relevant, and credible sustainability commitments demonstrate stronger and more consistent financial performance, underscoring that narrative depth and thematic relevance matter more than disclosure volume. Theoretically, the study unites stakeholder, institutional, sustainability accounting, impact measurement, and dynamic capabilities perspectives to explain how ESG reporting converts external legitimacy pressures into internal adaptive capacity and long‐term value creation. Practically, it highlights the importance of linking ESG disclosures to measurable SDG targets and using real‐time sustainability indicators to enhance transparency. Overall, the research advances a temporally sensitive and impact‐oriented understanding of ESG reporting as both a semantic construct and an adaptive process that builds trust, strengthens governance, and generates sustained financial and societal value.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental ManagementVol. 33(2)
National Taipei University of Technology (TW), National Taipei University of Business (TW), National Taipei University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.