Listening is Better Understood with: Minds, Milieux, Machines & Musics

This paper proposes a conceptual framework for understanding listening as a four-way interaction in-and-between minds, milieux, machines, and musics. Building on cognitive, ecological, computational, and cultural approaches to sound, we explore how each of these elements contributes uniquely to auditory experience and interpretation. Minds bring perceptual, cognitive, and emotional grounding; milieux provide ecological and sociocultural contexts; machines offer tools for sensing, modeling, and synthesis in sonic environments; and musics embody structured forms of human expression and shared aesthetic meanings. Through pairwise and three-way analyses, we identify the pitfalls of excluding any one component—leading to disembodiment, inefficiency, or cultural disconnection. We advocate for a transdisciplinary synthesis that situates listening within networks of perception, technology, and environment. Our goal is to recenter listening as a reflexive, situated, and multiscalar practice across disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17502661
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Listening is Better Understood with: Minds, Milieux, Machines & Musics

Etienne Thoret, Vincent Lostanlen
SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

Listening is Better Understood with: Minds, Milieux, Machines & Musics

Etienne Thoret, Vincent Lostanlen
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a conceptual framework for understanding listening as a four-way interaction in-and-between minds, milieux, machines, and musics. Building on cognitive, ecological, computational, and cultural approaches to sound, we explore how each of these elements contributes uniquely to auditory experience and interpretation. Minds bring perceptual, cognitive, and emotional grounding; milieux provide ecological and sociocultural contexts; machines offer tools for sensing, modeling, and synthesis in sonic environments; and musics embody structured forms of human expression and shared aesthetic meanings. Through pairwise and three-way analyses, we identify the pitfalls of excluding any one component—leading to disembodiment, inefficiency, or cultural disconnection. We advocate for a transdisciplinary synthesis that situates listening within networks of perception, technology, and environment. Our goal is to recenter listening as a reflexive, situated, and multiscalar practice across disciplines.

SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (FR), Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone (FR), Nantes Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Listening is Better Understood with: Minds, Milieux, Machines & Musics — Etienne Thoret, Vincent Lostanlen · SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS