Accuracy of Freehand, Static, and Dynamic Computer‐Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Both static and dynamic computer-assisted implant placement techniques are considered reliable methods for enhancing accurate implant positioning, offering significantly greater accuracy compared to the conventional freehand approach. The presence of bias risks and notable heterogeneity in the included investigations warrants careful consideration of the results.
Authors
- Stefan Roehling (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-7767)
- Annika Kröger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1915-0132)
- Moritz Kebschull (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1863-0679)
- Florian Sebastian Reiff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6661-3498)
- Christine Reiff
Institutions
- Birmingham City University (GB)
- University of Basel (CH)
- University of Luxembourg (LU)
- Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
- Straumann (Switzerland) (CH)
- University Hospital of Basel (CH)
- Hospital Base (CL)
- Birmingham Dental Hospital (GB)
- Dr D Y Patil Dental College & Hospital (IN)
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
- Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen (DE)
- Columbia University (US)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Periodontal Research
- Published
- 2025-11-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.70047
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.79