Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy: A multi-center retrospective analysis
Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) has become a preferred method over open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for treating localized renal tumors. This multi-center retrospective study examines the long-term oncological and renal functional outcomes of MIPN compared to OPN. Data from five tertiary centres were reviewed over a decade. Data indicates that while oncological control is similar for both methods, MIPN provides superior renal preservation and fewer complications. Thus, we show MIPN as a safe and effective long-term alternative to OPN.
Authors
- Keerthana Sekar
- M. V. Sajeev
- J. Varghese
- G. Subraya Bhat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6033-0501)
- Omar S. Usmani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4367-254X)
- Navaneeth Ranjith
- Shanmukha Koppolu
Institutions
- Tirunelveli Medical College (IN)
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
- Caritas Hospital (IN)
- Queens Hospital Center (US)
- Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital (IN)
- East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Bioinformation
- Published
- 2025-11-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300214028
- Primary Topic
- Renal cell carcinoma treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00