Evaluation of microleakage in composite restorations with various adhesive systems: An in vitro comparison

Microleakage is a persistent challenge in adhesive dentistry and has a direct effect on the longevity of composite restorations. This <i>in vitro</i> study performed in accordance with the criteria of the preferred guidelines, investigated and compared, microleakage status of restorative bonded with etch-and-rinse, self-etch and universal adhesive systems. Twelve extracted human premolars were restored using standardized class V cavities and then utilized for dye penetration farming after thermocycling. Data analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in sealing ability with respect to each adhesive group. Universal adhesives demonstrated a lower amount of microleakage than self-etch and etch-and-rinse systems. Microleakage is an important factor in adhesive bonding ultimately dictates failure or success the selection of an appropriate adhesive may relate to the reduction of adhesion and therefore increases the chance of restorative success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinformation
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300214035
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of microleakage in composite restorations with various adhesive systems: An in vitro comparison

Rini Behera, Mohammed Khwaja Moinuddin, Manàs Dave, Kunj Patel et al.
Bioinformation
Dental materials and restorations
article

Evaluation of microleakage in composite restorations with various adhesive systems: An in vitro comparison

Rini Behera, Mohammed Khwaja Moinuddin, Manàs Dave, Kunj Patel, Satabdi Pattanaik, Sruthi Katamneni
article en

Abstract

Microleakage is a persistent challenge in adhesive dentistry and has a direct effect on the longevity of composite restorations. This <i>in vitro</i> study performed in accordance with the criteria of the preferred guidelines, investigated and compared, microleakage status of restorative bonded with etch-and-rinse, self-etch and universal adhesive systems. Twelve extracted human premolars were restored using standardized class V cavities and then utilized for dye penetration farming after thermocycling. Data analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in sealing ability with respect to each adhesive group. Universal adhesives demonstrated a lower amount of microleakage than self-etch and etch-and-rinse systems. Microleakage is an important factor in adhesive bonding ultimately dictates failure or success the selection of an appropriate adhesive may relate to the reduction of adhesion and therefore increases the chance of restorative success.

BioinformationVol. 21(11)
Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN), Cincinnati Health Department (US), Institute of Life Sciences (IN), McDermott International (United States) (US), Bethlehem Area School District (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.