Linking multiple serological assays to infer dengue virus infections from paired samples using mixture models

Dengue virus (DENV) is an increasingly important human pathogen, with already half of the globe's population living in environments with transmission potential. Since many cases are missed by direct detection methods (RT-PCR or antigen tests), serological assays play an important role in the diagnostic process. However, individual assays can suffer from low sensitivity and specificity and interpreting results from multiple assays remains challenging, particularly because interpretations from multiple assays may differ, creating uncertainty over how to generate finalized interpretations. We develop a Bayesian mixture model that can jointly model data from multiple paired serological assays, to infer infection events. We first test the performance of our model using simulated data. We then apply our model to 677 pairs of acute and convalescent serum collected as a part of illness and household investigations across two longitudinal cohort studies in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand, including data from 232 RT-PCR confirmed infections (gold standard). We compare the classification of the new model to prior standard interpretations that independently utilize information from either the hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) or the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA). We find that additional serological assays improve accuracy of infection detection for both simulated and real world data. Models incorporating paired IgG and IgM data as well as those incorporating IgG, IgM, and HAI data consistently have higher accuracy when using PCR confirmed infections as a gold standard (87-90% F1 scores, a combined metric of sensitivity and specificity) than currently implemented cut-point approaches (82-84% F1 scores). Our results provide a probabilistic framework through which multiple serological assays across different platforms can be leveraged across sequential serum samples to provide insight into whether individuals have recently experienced a DENV infection. These methods are applicable to other pathogen systems where multiple serological assays can be leveraged to quantify infection history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013708
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linking multiple serological assays to infer dengue virus infections from paired samples using mixture models

Sopon Iamsirithaworn, Surachai Kaewhiran, Derek A. T. Cummings, Aaron Farmer et al.
1 citations
PLoS Computational Biology
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
1.88
article

Linking multiple serological assays to infer dengue virus infections from paired samples using mixture models

Sopon Iamsirithaworn, Surachai Kaewhiran, Derek A. T. Cummings, Aaron Farmer, Kathryn B. Anderson, Darunee Buddhari, Timothy P. Endy, Alan L. Rothman, Stefan Fernandez, Isabel Rodríguez-Barraquer, Stephen James Thomas, Taweewun Hunsawong, Marco Hamins-Puértolas, Anon Srikiatkhachorn, Angkana T. Huang, Adam T. Waickman, Direk Khampaen, Henrik Salje
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Dengue virus (DENV) is an increasingly important human pathogen, with already half of the globe's population living in environments with transmission potential. Since many cases are missed by direct detection methods (RT-PCR or antigen tests), serological assays play an important role in the diagnostic process. However, individual assays can suffer from low sensitivity and specificity and interpreting results from multiple assays remains challenging, particularly because interpretations from multiple assays may differ, creating uncertainty over how to generate finalized interpretations. We develop a Bayesian mixture model that can jointly model data from multiple paired serological assays, to infer infection events. We first test the performance of our model using simulated data. We then apply our model to 677 pairs of acute and convalescent serum collected as a part of illness and household investigations across two longitudinal cohort studies in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand, including data from 232 RT-PCR confirmed infections (gold standard). We compare the classification of the new model to prior standard interpretations that independently utilize information from either the hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) or the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA). We find that additional serological assays improve accuracy of infection detection for both simulated and real world data. Models incorporating paired IgG and IgM data as well as those incorporating IgG, IgM, and HAI data consistently have higher accuracy when using PCR confirmed infections as a gold standard (87-90% F1 scores, a combined metric of sensitivity and specificity) than currently implemented cut-point approaches (82-84% F1 scores). Our results provide a probabilistic framework through which multiple serological assays across different platforms can be leveraged across sequential serum samples to provide insight into whether individuals have recently experienced a DENV infection. These methods are applicable to other pathogen systems where multiple serological assays can be leveraged to quantify infection history.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 21(11)
Ministry of Public Health (TH), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Rhode Island (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Providence College (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (US), Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (TH), Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (United States) (US), King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (TH), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.