Real-world evidence of the use of Cloudscaper optotypes versus LEA symbols for virtual or digital visual acuity measurement in children aged 3 to 16 years

Cloudscaper symbols provide a reliable tool for visual screening in children. Although they slightly underestimate visual acuity compared to LEA symbols - a finding also reported when comparing ETDRS letters with LEA symbols - Cloudscaper symbols show strong agreement with Snellen E chart measurements. This suggests that Cloudscaper symbols allow precise visual acuity assessment comparable to the gold standard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2025-0049
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world evidence of the use of Cloudscaper optotypes versus LEA symbols for virtual or digital visual acuity measurement in children aged 3 to 16 years

Paulo Schor, Júlia Dutra Rossetto, Luisa Moreira Höpker, Ana Carolina Carneiro et al.
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Real-world evidence of the use of Cloudscaper optotypes versus LEA symbols for virtual or digital visual acuity measurement in children aged 3 to 16 years

Paulo Schor, Júlia Dutra Rossetto, Luisa Moreira Höpker, Ana Carolina Carneiro, Bárbara Stofel Ventorin, Cristiana Ronconi
article en

Abstract

Cloudscaper symbols provide a reliable tool for visual screening in children. Although they slightly underestimate visual acuity compared to LEA symbols - a finding also reported when comparing ETDRS letters with LEA symbols - Cloudscaper symbols show strong agreement with Snellen E chart measurements. This suggests that Cloudscaper symbols allow precise visual acuity assessment comparable to the gold standard.

Arquivos Brasileiros de OftalmologiaVol. 89(1)
Universidade Positivo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.