Effective Antivirals in Pandemic Preparedness: Past Mistakes, Future Needs

The next pandemic may demand faster, more flexible responses with better risk-benefit and cost-benefit ratios than current systems can deliver. During COVID-19, R&D funding allocation strongly favored vaccines over antivirals and regulatory approvals of vaccines far exceeded approvals for antivirals. Moreover, early evidence on antiviral effectiveness was often limited or even misleading. Antivirals may have advantages in early outbreak control, high-risk populations, and settings with delayed vaccine uptake. For future pandemics, we propose a dedicated antiviral agenda to coordinate R&D for broad-spectrum agents, fund Phase 2/3 trials for high-severity pathogens, enable rapid manufacturing scale-up for demonstrably effective interventions, and secure equitable global access through tiered pricing, stockpiling, and technology transfer. This platform would fill the critical therapeutic blind spot in existing pandemic vaccine-centric strategies. The proposed approach should ensure transparency, strengthen equity, and provide rigorous evidence for both vaccines and antivirals, dissecting their relative benefits, limitations, complementarity and cost-benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf648
Citations
1
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effective Antivirals in Pandemic Preparedness: Past Mistakes, Future Needs

Athanasios Tsakris, Cleo G. Anastassopoulou, John P. A. Ioannidis, Antonios-Periklis Panagiotopoulos
1 citations
Clinical Infectious Diseases
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
1.40
article

Effective Antivirals in Pandemic Preparedness: Past Mistakes, Future Needs

Athanasios Tsakris, Cleo G. Anastassopoulou, John P. A. Ioannidis, Antonios-Periklis Panagiotopoulos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The next pandemic may demand faster, more flexible responses with better risk-benefit and cost-benefit ratios than current systems can deliver. During COVID-19, R&D funding allocation strongly favored vaccines over antivirals and regulatory approvals of vaccines far exceeded approvals for antivirals. Moreover, early evidence on antiviral effectiveness was often limited or even misleading. Antivirals may have advantages in early outbreak control, high-risk populations, and settings with delayed vaccine uptake. For future pandemics, we propose a dedicated antiviral agenda to coordinate R&D for broad-spectrum agents, fund Phase 2/3 trials for high-severity pathogens, enable rapid manufacturing scale-up for demonstrably effective interventions, and secure equitable global access through tiered pricing, stockpiling, and technology transfer. This platform would fill the critical therapeutic blind spot in existing pandemic vaccine-centric strategies. The proposed approach should ensure transparency, strengthen equity, and provide rigorous evidence for both vaccines and antivirals, dissecting their relative benefits, limitations, complementarity and cost-benefit.

Clinical Infectious Diseases
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Stanford Health Care (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effective Antivirals in Pandemic Preparedness: Past Mistakes, Future Needs — Athanasios Tsakris, Cleo G. Anastassopoulou, et al. · Clinical Infectious Diseases (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS