Analyzing al‐Ghazali’s Perspective on Christianity: A Critical Examination of <i> al‐Raddu al‐Jamīlu li Ilahiyyat <scp>ʿĪsā</scp> bi‐Ṣarīḥi al‐Injīli </i>

Abstract A comprehensive understanding of the thoughts and sources referenced by dialogue partners is fundamental to effective interfaith dialogue. This article offers a scholarly analysis of Imam al‐Ghazali’s (d. 1111 CE) approach to interfaith dialogue, particularly his interactions with Christianity as outlined in his work, al‐Raddu al‐Jamīlu li Ilahiyyat ʿĪsā bi‐Ṣarīḥi al‐Injīli. Employing a content analysis methodology, this study examines al‐Ghazali’s principal writings on interreligious engagement, with a special emphasis on Christian‐Muslim relations. The findings indicate that al‐Ghazali adopts a triadic approach: debate, theological comparison, and apologetics. He begins by identifying the primary theological divergence between Islam and Christianity—the divinity of Jesus. Subsequently, he employs theological comparison, reinterpreting contentious texts by referencing both the Gospel and the Qur’an. Additionally, al‐Ghazali uses rational critique to highlight the perceived weaknesses in Christian doctrinal positions. This study suggests that al‐Ghazali’s method can be instrumental in contemporary theological discourse, promoting a nuanced and critical exploration of the areas of convergence and divergence among different religious traditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Muslim World
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.70007
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing al‐Ghazali’s Perspective on Christianity: A Critical Examination of al‐Raddu al‐Jamīlu li Ilahiyyat ʿĪsā bi‐Ṣarīḥi al‐Injīli

Jaffary Awang, Ahmad Faizuddin Ramli
The Muslim World
Islamic Studies and History
article

Analyzing al‐Ghazali’s Perspective on Christianity: A Critical Examination of al‐Raddu al‐Jamīlu li Ilahiyyat ʿĪsā bi‐Ṣarīḥi al‐Injīli

Jaffary Awang, Ahmad Faizuddin Ramli
article en

Abstract

Abstract A comprehensive understanding of the thoughts and sources referenced by dialogue partners is fundamental to effective interfaith dialogue. This article offers a scholarly analysis of Imam al‐Ghazali’s (d. 1111 CE) approach to interfaith dialogue, particularly his interactions with Christianity as outlined in his work, al‐Raddu al‐Jamīlu li Ilahiyyat ʿĪsā bi‐Ṣarīḥi al‐Injīli. Employing a content analysis methodology, this study examines al‐Ghazali’s principal writings on interreligious engagement, with a special emphasis on Christian‐Muslim relations. The findings indicate that al‐Ghazali adopts a triadic approach: debate, theological comparison, and apologetics. He begins by identifying the primary theological divergence between Islam and Christianity—the divinity of Jesus. Subsequently, he employs theological comparison, reinterpreting contentious texts by referencing both the Gospel and the Qur’an. Additionally, al‐Ghazali uses rational critique to highlight the perceived weaknesses in Christian doctrinal positions. This study suggests that al‐Ghazali’s method can be instrumental in contemporary theological discourse, promoting a nuanced and critical exploration of the areas of convergence and divergence among different religious traditions.

The Muslim World
Sultan Idris Education University (MY), University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (MY), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.