Innovation in Rural Nonprofits: Which Organizational Capacities Matter Most?

ABSTRACT This research note draws on theory and empirical research from the broader fields of management, organizational capacity, and innovation to examine how specific organizational capacities relate to innovation in a sample of 107 rural nonprofit organizations in a Southeastern U.S. state. While six capacities – human resources, financial management, revenue development, planning and development, collaboration and stakeholder engagement, and adaptive capacity – were positively correlated with innovation, only adaptive capacity and collaboration/stakeholder engagement emerged as significant predictors in a multivariate model. These findings highlight the potential relevance of internal and external capacities to innovation in resource‐constrained rural settings. The note concludes with implications for practice and outlines limitations and directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70027
Primary Topic
Community and Sustainable Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovation in Rural Nonprofits: Which Organizational Capacities Matter Most?

Lina Danusevičienė, Ashley Hunter, Kristina Jaskyte
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Community and Sustainable Development
article

Innovation in Rural Nonprofits: Which Organizational Capacities Matter Most?

Lina Danusevičienė, Ashley Hunter, Kristina Jaskyte
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research note draws on theory and empirical research from the broader fields of management, organizational capacity, and innovation to examine how specific organizational capacities relate to innovation in a sample of 107 rural nonprofit organizations in a Southeastern U.S. state. While six capacities – human resources, financial management, revenue development, planning and development, collaboration and stakeholder engagement, and adaptive capacity – were positively correlated with innovation, only adaptive capacity and collaboration/stakeholder engagement emerged as significant predictors in a multivariate model. These findings highlight the potential relevance of internal and external capacities to innovation in resource‐constrained rural settings. The note concludes with implications for practice and outlines limitations and directions for future research.

Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT), University of Georgia (US), Georgian Aviation University (GE), Agricultural University of Georgia (GE), University of Georgia (GE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Community and Sustainable Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.