Appraising the current landscape of reviews on mpox vaccination: a rapid evidence map

Abstract Introduction Vaccination is a potent countermeasure for interrupting the spread of mpox, which is currently a priority public health problem in Africa. Backed by emergency declarations from both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), governments, with support from health partners, are accelerating momentum for mpox vaccine deployment in countries with active transmission to prevent further spread. Although evidence is crucial for informing mpox vaccination policies and practice decisions, the existing knowledge gaps are not well explored. Objective To identify existing reviews on mpox vaccination and assess the evidence landscape to identify knowledge gaps. Methods A rapid review approach was used to map the existing synthesized literature on mpox vaccination. Results The database search (finalized in September 2024) included seven electronic databases and yielded 1650 results. After systematic screening based on predefined inclusion criteria, 31 reviews were selected. These included 17 systematic reviews, 11 narrative reviews, and three rapid reviews on mpox vaccination. Most of the literature focused on the immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of first- and second-generation mpox vaccines. However, there is limited evidence on the immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of third-generation vaccines (including the WHO-prequalified Modified Vaccinia Ankara–Bavarian Nordic vaccine) in Africa and among subpopulations such as children, women of reproductive age, and pregnant women. Additionally, existing studies on vaccine acceptance and uptake mainly concentrate on men who have sex with men, with insufficient evidence concerning other high-risk groups like female sex workers. Conclusion This study has identified gaps both in the scarcity of studies on the immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of MVA-BN in African settings, as well as in the target populations of the outbreak. There is an urgent need to accelerate mpox vaccination research in Africa through primary studies and evidence synthesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-025-01174-5
Primary Topic
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appraising the current landscape of reviews on mpox vaccination: a rapid evidence map

Duduzile Ndwandwe, Rabiu Ibrahim Jalo, Sidy Ndiaye, Charles Shey Wiysonge et al.
Discover Public Health
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
article

Appraising the current landscape of reviews on mpox vaccination: a rapid evidence map

Duduzile Ndwandwe, Rabiu Ibrahim Jalo, Sidy Ndiaye, Charles Shey Wiysonge, Joseph Okeibunor, Samuel Boland, Abdu A. Adamu, Reena H. Doshi, Patrick DMC Katoto
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Vaccination is a potent countermeasure for interrupting the spread of mpox, which is currently a priority public health problem in Africa. Backed by emergency declarations from both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), governments, with support from health partners, are accelerating momentum for mpox vaccine deployment in countries with active transmission to prevent further spread. Although evidence is crucial for informing mpox vaccination policies and practice decisions, the existing knowledge gaps are not well explored. Objective To identify existing reviews on mpox vaccination and assess the evidence landscape to identify knowledge gaps. Methods A rapid review approach was used to map the existing synthesized literature on mpox vaccination. Results The database search (finalized in September 2024) included seven electronic databases and yielded 1650 results. After systematic screening based on predefined inclusion criteria, 31 reviews were selected. These included 17 systematic reviews, 11 narrative reviews, and three rapid reviews on mpox vaccination. Most of the literature focused on the immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of first- and second-generation mpox vaccines. However, there is limited evidence on the immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of third-generation vaccines (including the WHO-prequalified Modified Vaccinia Ankara–Bavarian Nordic vaccine) in Africa and among subpopulations such as children, women of reproductive age, and pregnant women. Additionally, existing studies on vaccine acceptance and uptake mainly concentrate on men who have sex with men, with insufficient evidence concerning other high-risk groups like female sex workers. Conclusion This study has identified gaps both in the scarcity of studies on the immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of MVA-BN in African settings, as well as in the target populations of the outbreak. There is an urgent need to accelerate mpox vaccination research in Africa through primary studies and evidence synthesis.

Discover Public HealthVol. 22(1)
South African Medical Research Council (ZA), Université Catholique de Bukavu (CD), World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (CG), Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (NG), Bayero University Kano (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.