Risk assessment and prediction of early blood transfusion after joint replacement surgery: a clinical decision support model based on machine learning

Postoperative blood transfusion remains a major challenge in joint arthroplasty, with substantial variability in clinical decision-making. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for early postoperative transfusion risk assessment to support early postoperative decision-making, with the clinical objective of minimizing unnecessary transfusions and improving perioperative blood resource utilization after joint arthroplasty. We retrospectively analyzed 1,954 patients who underwent primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty between June 2019 and December 2024. Patients were categorized according to whether they received allogeneic transfusion within 72 h postoperatively. The dataset was randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. Logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) models were developed based on 15 key variables identified through LASSO regression. Model discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated using ROC curves, Hosmer–Lemeshow tests, Brier scores, calibration slopes/intercepts, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHAP analysis was used to interpret variable importance. Among all patients, 172 (8.8%) received transfusions. All three models showed good discrimination (AUC > 0.75). The RF model achieved the best overall performance (training AUC = 1.000; validation AUC = 0.808, sensitivity = 87.5%, specificity = 59.0%; Brier score = 0.0651). The LR model also demonstrated stable calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.097, Brier = 0.0679), while the SVM model achieved moderate discrimination (validation AUC = 0.776) but weaker calibration. DCA confirmed that the RF model provided the greatest net clinical benefit within a threshold range of 0.1–0.75. SHAP analysis of RF model showed that postoperative hemoglobin, preoperative hemoglobin and operation time were the most important predictors. Postoperative and preoperative haemoglobin levels, along with operative duration, were important predictors of early postoperative transfusion. The RF model demonstrated good predictive performance and clinical value, supporting its potential use for individualized transfusion risk assessment in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03299-8
Primary Topic
Blood transfusion and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk assessment and prediction of early blood transfusion after joint replacement surgery: a clinical decision support model based on machine learning

Yuanliang Du, Changjiang Shi, Wei Qin, Tianjie Xiao et al.
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Blood transfusion and management
article

Risk assessment and prediction of early blood transfusion after joint replacement surgery: a clinical decision support model based on machine learning

Yuanliang Du, Changjiang Shi, Wei Qin, Tianjie Xiao, Haitao Zhao, Tonghai Xing, Z. Wang, Jincai Duan, Di Wu
article en

Abstract

Postoperative blood transfusion remains a major challenge in joint arthroplasty, with substantial variability in clinical decision-making. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for early postoperative transfusion risk assessment to support early postoperative decision-making, with the clinical objective of minimizing unnecessary transfusions and improving perioperative blood resource utilization after joint arthroplasty. We retrospectively analyzed 1,954 patients who underwent primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty between June 2019 and December 2024. Patients were categorized according to whether they received allogeneic transfusion within 72 h postoperatively. The dataset was randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. Logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) models were developed based on 15 key variables identified through LASSO regression. Model discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated using ROC curves, Hosmer–Lemeshow tests, Brier scores, calibration slopes/intercepts, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHAP analysis was used to interpret variable importance. Among all patients, 172 (8.8%) received transfusions. All three models showed good discrimination (AUC > 0.75). The RF model achieved the best overall performance (training AUC = 1.000; validation AUC = 0.808, sensitivity = 87.5%, specificity = 59.0%; Brier score = 0.0651). The LR model also demonstrated stable calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.097, Brier = 0.0679), while the SVM model achieved moderate discrimination (validation AUC = 0.776) but weaker calibration. DCA confirmed that the RF model provided the greatest net clinical benefit within a threshold range of 0.1–0.75. SHAP analysis of RF model showed that postoperative hemoglobin, preoperative hemoglobin and operation time were the most important predictors. Postoperative and preoperative haemoglobin levels, along with operative duration, were important predictors of early postoperative transfusion. The RF model demonstrated good predictive performance and clinical value, supporting its potential use for individualized transfusion risk assessment in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingVol. 25(1)
Central South University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College (CN), Chengde Medical University (CN), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Blood transfusion and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.