Invisible Loot

This article offers a new reading of Hugo Grotius’s early treatise De Jure Praedae Commentarius (Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, 1604-1606), approaching this text from the perspective of material culture. Commissioned by the Dutch East India Company (VOC) after Dutch seafarers confiscated the Portuguese carrack Santa Catarina and its cargo, Grotius’s text, this article proposes, deliberately obscures the ways the Dutch valued objects as trophies, loot, and spoils. Analysis of De Jure Praedae reveals that Grotius argues against the display of material wealth that the Dutch had acquired as loot, negatively associating it with the Portuguese and Spanish empires and instead propagating the invisible dispersal of the booty. In this way, De Jure Praedae, an early work by a major apologist of the VOC, rationalised the continuous circulation of objects in the service of Dutch empire-building. The article’s broader project is to speak to scholars of the global circulation of material culture and of empire alike to contribute to a history of how looted objects were conceived as key instruments in Dutch imperial expansion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Early Modern Low Countries
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51750/emlc19186
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invisible Loot

Elsje van Kessel
Early Modern Low Countries
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

Invisible Loot

Elsje van Kessel
article en

Abstract

This article offers a new reading of Hugo Grotius’s early treatise De Jure Praedae Commentarius (Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, 1604-1606), approaching this text from the perspective of material culture. Commissioned by the Dutch East India Company (VOC) after Dutch seafarers confiscated the Portuguese carrack Santa Catarina and its cargo, Grotius’s text, this article proposes, deliberately obscures the ways the Dutch valued objects as trophies, loot, and spoils. Analysis of De Jure Praedae reveals that Grotius argues against the display of material wealth that the Dutch had acquired as loot, negatively associating it with the Portuguese and Spanish empires and instead propagating the invisible dispersal of the booty. In this way, De Jure Praedae, an early work by a major apologist of the VOC, rationalised the continuous circulation of objects in the service of Dutch empire-building. The article’s broader project is to speak to scholars of the global circulation of material culture and of empire alike to contribute to a history of how looted objects were conceived as key instruments in Dutch imperial expansion.

Early Modern Low CountriesVol. 9(2)
University of St Andrews (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Invisible Loot — Elsje van Kessel · Early Modern Low Countries (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS