Inequity in imaging: Why it matters? A statement from the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology

The ESR equity, diversity and inclusivity (EDI) subcommittee is a part of the Young ESR committee created in 2024. This statement paper is the first in our series regarding EDI and radiology. In this paper, we examine and discuss issues which have been studied and reported regarding the inequity of imaging services. Inequity is prevalent in radiology and imaging circles in Europe. The variations observed in women, ethnic, age, disabled, non-binary, and gender groups are examined, as well as the variations in radiology research and in artificial intelligence-related imaging. Radiology departments need to be aware of the existing variations in radiology services. They need to educate their personnel on the etiquette and interaction with diverse populations. There should be versatile equipment to serve patients with disabilities. Radiologists should be aware of the lack of evidence-based knowledge with regard to female and non-white populations. Regarding clinical AI, departments need to actively audit and check for possible biases in AI in clinical use. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Understanding how EDI affects patient care is vital to providing equitable service to all patients. Radiologists should be aware of the lack of evidence-based knowledge regarding female and non-white populations, and be sensibly critical of guidelines which lack proper evidence. KEY POINTS: The workflow of the department should be organised so that all patients are served equitably. Radiologists need to be aware of the lack of evidence-based knowledge about female and non-white populations, and be critical of guidelines which lack proper evidence. Regarding AI, radiologists must actively audit and check for possible biases in AI in clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights into Imaging
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02144-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inequity in imaging: Why it matters? A statement from the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology

Anagha P. Parkar, Amaka C Offiah, Ioana-Andreea Gheonea, Mihai-Alexandru Ene
1 citations
Insights into Imaging
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Inequity in imaging: Why it matters? A statement from the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology

Anagha P. Parkar, Amaka C Offiah, Ioana-Andreea Gheonea, Mihai-Alexandru Ene
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The ESR equity, diversity and inclusivity (EDI) subcommittee is a part of the Young ESR committee created in 2024. This statement paper is the first in our series regarding EDI and radiology. In this paper, we examine and discuss issues which have been studied and reported regarding the inequity of imaging services. Inequity is prevalent in radiology and imaging circles in Europe. The variations observed in women, ethnic, age, disabled, non-binary, and gender groups are examined, as well as the variations in radiology research and in artificial intelligence-related imaging. Radiology departments need to be aware of the existing variations in radiology services. They need to educate their personnel on the etiquette and interaction with diverse populations. There should be versatile equipment to serve patients with disabilities. Radiologists should be aware of the lack of evidence-based knowledge with regard to female and non-white populations. Regarding clinical AI, departments need to actively audit and check for possible biases in AI in clinical use. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Understanding how EDI affects patient care is vital to providing equitable service to all patients. Radiologists should be aware of the lack of evidence-based knowledge regarding female and non-white populations, and be sensibly critical of guidelines which lack proper evidence. KEY POINTS: The workflow of the department should be organised so that all patients are served equitably. Radiologists need to be aware of the lack of evidence-based knowledge about female and non-white populations, and be critical of guidelines which lack proper evidence. Regarding AI, radiologists must actively audit and check for possible biases in AI in clinical use.

Insights into ImagingVol. 16(1)
University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova (RO), Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Haraldsplass Diakonale Sykehus (NO), University of Bergen (NO), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.