Modelling the quantum-like dynamics of human reliability ratings in human–AI interactions by interaction-dependent Hamiltonians

We are rapidly moving to a future in which our information environment is saturated by artificial intelligence (AI), and humans and AI agents will routinely engage in shared decision making even in conditions of high uncertainty and risk (such as natural disasters or nuclear accidents). Trust is fundamental to the effectiveness of these interactions. A key challenge in modelling the dynamics of trust in human-AI interactions is to provide a means to integrate the diversity of human trust fluctuations found empirically. In this article, we explore the ability of quantum random walk (QRW) models to model this dynamism of trust found in empirical human-AI interactions. Specifically, we manipulate certain features of the QRW to explore its ability to provide the necessary agility and sensitivity to fluctuations in trust judgments. The goal is to incorporate the nature of the interaction itself into the evolution of the model, with the features stemming from empirically derived parameters. We found that using empirical parameters to inform the use of different Hamiltonians throughout the interaction markedly influences the modelled trust dynamics and can provide a promising means to model the evolution of trust in human-AI interactions.This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum theory and topology in models of decision making (Part 1)'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0536
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling the quantum-like dynamics of human reliability ratings in human–AI interactions by interaction-dependent Hamiltonians

Luisa Roeder, Peter Bruza, Pamela Hoyte, J. van der Meer
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Modelling the quantum-like dynamics of human reliability ratings in human–AI interactions by interaction-dependent Hamiltonians

Luisa Roeder, Peter Bruza, Pamela Hoyte, J. van der Meer
article en

Abstract

We are rapidly moving to a future in which our information environment is saturated by artificial intelligence (AI), and humans and AI agents will routinely engage in shared decision making even in conditions of high uncertainty and risk (such as natural disasters or nuclear accidents). Trust is fundamental to the effectiveness of these interactions. A key challenge in modelling the dynamics of trust in human-AI interactions is to provide a means to integrate the diversity of human trust fluctuations found empirically. In this article, we explore the ability of quantum random walk (QRW) models to model this dynamism of trust found in empirical human-AI interactions. Specifically, we manipulate certain features of the QRW to explore its ability to provide the necessary agility and sensitivity to fluctuations in trust judgments. The goal is to incorporate the nature of the interaction itself into the evolution of the model, with the features stemming from empirically derived parameters. We found that using empirical parameters to inform the use of different Hamiltonians throughout the interaction markedly influences the modelled trust dynamics and can provide a promising means to model the evolution of trust in human-AI interactions.This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum theory and topology in models of decision making (Part 1)'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 383(2309)
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.