One Versus Two Screw Fixation in Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Systematic Review

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hallux valgus has evolved significantly, with ongoing debate about optimal fixation methods. Fourth-generation techniques typically use two metatarsal screws; however, single screw fixation may reduce operative time, radiation exposure, and cost. This systematic review compares clinical outcomes, radiographic results, and complications between one- and two-screw metatarsal fixation in minimally invasive hallux valgus correction. A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases from inception to March 2025. Studies comparing single versus two screw fixation in minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Primary outcomes included radiographic parameters (Hallux Valgus Angle (HVA), Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA), Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle (DMAA)) and clinical outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ)). Secondary outcomes included operative details, complications, and revision surgery rates. Five studies met inclusion criteria: two clinical (n = 153 patients, 162 feet) and three biomechanical studies. Clinical studies showed comparable radiographic correction and patient-reported outcomes between fixation methods. Single screw fixation demonstrated significantly shorter operative time and reduced fluoroscopy exposure. Hardware-related complications requiring removal were higher in two-screw groups (32% vs. 3% in one study; 1.9% vs. 0% in another). Biomechanical studies revealed that single screw fixation may provide insufficient rotational stability, while two-screw configurations demonstrated improved construct stability. Current evidence suggests that single screw fixation may reduce radiation exposure, surgical time, and hardware removal rates, but offers reduced biomechanical stability compared to a two-screw construct in patients undergoing minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery. However, the high risk of bias, limited comparative data, methodological heterogeneity, and relatively short follow-up periods in existing studies preclude definitive conclusions. Current evidence is insufficient to establish definitive recommendations, and fixation strategy should be individualised based on deformity characteristics and patient factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97907
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Versus Two Screw Fixation in Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Systematic Review

Peter Lam, Robbie Ray, Tyler Gonzalez, Ettore Vulcano et al.
Cureus
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

One Versus Two Screw Fixation in Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Systematic Review

Peter Lam, Robbie Ray, Tyler Gonzalez, Ettore Vulcano, Bradley P. Abicht, Thomas Lewis, Lily Fletcher, Jonathan Kaplan, Choon Chiet Hong
article en

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hallux valgus has evolved significantly, with ongoing debate about optimal fixation methods. Fourth-generation techniques typically use two metatarsal screws; however, single screw fixation may reduce operative time, radiation exposure, and cost. This systematic review compares clinical outcomes, radiographic results, and complications between one- and two-screw metatarsal fixation in minimally invasive hallux valgus correction. A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases from inception to March 2025. Studies comparing single versus two screw fixation in minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Primary outcomes included radiographic parameters (Hallux Valgus Angle (HVA), Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA), Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle (DMAA)) and clinical outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ)). Secondary outcomes included operative details, complications, and revision surgery rates. Five studies met inclusion criteria: two clinical (n = 153 patients, 162 feet) and three biomechanical studies. Clinical studies showed comparable radiographic correction and patient-reported outcomes between fixation methods. Single screw fixation demonstrated significantly shorter operative time and reduced fluoroscopy exposure. Hardware-related complications requiring removal were higher in two-screw groups (32% vs. 3% in one study; 1.9% vs. 0% in another). Biomechanical studies revealed that single screw fixation may provide insufficient rotational stability, while two-screw configurations demonstrated improved construct stability. Current evidence suggests that single screw fixation may reduce radiation exposure, surgical time, and hardware removal rates, but offers reduced biomechanical stability compared to a two-screw construct in patients undergoing minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery. However, the high risk of bias, limited comparative data, methodological heterogeneity, and relatively short follow-up periods in existing studies preclude definitive conclusions. Current evidence is insufficient to establish definitive recommendations, and fixation strategy should be individualised based on deformity characteristics and patient factors.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Gundersen Health System (US), University of South Carolina (US), Duke University (US), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (US), Mount Sinai Medical Center (US), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust (GB), National University Hospital (SG), Duke University Hospital (US), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.