The CAPM in the ESG era: disentangling the general transition risk

Purpose The purpose of this study, in line with Zerbib’s S-CAPM (2022) and and Hens and Trutwin (2023), is to deploy the theoretical implications of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and analyse the impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) preferences on asset returns within a linear and concise framework, suggesting also a mechanical approach to extrapolate (indirectly) the investors’ view on the evolution of the ESG cycle. Design/methodology/approach The authors estimate, for each market sub-index (i.e. leader, intermediate and follower), a cross-sectional regression with Huber–White standard errors to account for heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors. The authors perform an additional analysis to capture the cyclical extent of the phenomenon. Therefore, the authors run also an ordinary least squares rolling (i.e. constantly changing fixed window) regression for analysing changing relationships among variables overtime. The authors conclude estimating the catch-up process prediction through a logit model. Findings The ESG CAPM model should prove a temporary framework inversely correlated with the maturity of the ESG cycle. The authors show that the phi coefficient (i.e. general transition risk) is not only positive and statistically significant exclusively for the Follower and Intermediate indices, but it is higher for the former. It represents the potential (and likely) extra-return (and risk) arising from the business model “catch-up effect” rather than a mere investor’s preference. So, it is feasible to isolate the “general transition risk” preserving the “systemic risk” to extrapolate information about the investors’ perception on the evolution of the ESG market cycle. Originality/value The findings contribute to the influential literature that aims to explain the expected extra-performance of passively following an ESG-screened index within the risk–return paradigm, suggesting a linear theoretical integration to the classic CAPM to take into account the ESG premium. The authors empirically test it by creating innovative ESG indices proxies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Governance
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-10-2024-0560
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The CAPM in the ESG era: disentangling the general transition risk

Michele Patanè, Stefano Zedda, Michele Anelli
Corporate Governance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The CAPM in the ESG era: disentangling the general transition risk

Michele Patanè, Stefano Zedda, Michele Anelli
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study, in line with Zerbib’s S-CAPM (2022) and and Hens and Trutwin (2023), is to deploy the theoretical implications of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and analyse the impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) preferences on asset returns within a linear and concise framework, suggesting also a mechanical approach to extrapolate (indirectly) the investors’ view on the evolution of the ESG cycle. Design/methodology/approach The authors estimate, for each market sub-index (i.e. leader, intermediate and follower), a cross-sectional regression with Huber–White standard errors to account for heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors. The authors perform an additional analysis to capture the cyclical extent of the phenomenon. Therefore, the authors run also an ordinary least squares rolling (i.e. constantly changing fixed window) regression for analysing changing relationships among variables overtime. The authors conclude estimating the catch-up process prediction through a logit model. Findings The ESG CAPM model should prove a temporary framework inversely correlated with the maturity of the ESG cycle. The authors show that the phi coefficient (i.e. general transition risk) is not only positive and statistically significant exclusively for the Follower and Intermediate indices, but it is higher for the former. It represents the potential (and likely) extra-return (and risk) arising from the business model “catch-up effect” rather than a mere investor’s preference. So, it is feasible to isolate the “general transition risk” preserving the “systemic risk” to extrapolate information about the investors’ perception on the evolution of the ESG market cycle. Originality/value The findings contribute to the influential literature that aims to explain the expected extra-performance of passively following an ESG-screened index within the risk–return paradigm, suggesting a linear theoretical integration to the classic CAPM to take into account the ESG premium. The authors empirically test it by creating innovative ESG indices proxies.

Corporate Governance
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The CAPM in the ESG era: disentangling the general transition risk — Michele Patanè, Stefano Zedda, et al. · Corporate Governance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS