Analysis of Gen Z Marketing Student Preference for Different Instructional Methods

Marketing student preference for six different instructional methods was determined using a choice-based conjoint analysis. Each instructional method was a significant determinant of students’ choice of a given class, but the six methods varied significantly in terms of their importance weights. Results of conjoint analysis indicate that the three most preferred drivers of student choice for a marketing class are: 1) it employs a flipped classroom, 2) its class sessions are interactive and hands-on, rather than lecture-based and 3) it has a moderate, rather than a heavy workload. Latent class cluster analysis was conducted, and four preference-based segments were identified. These segments highlight the different preferences of students and add more insight into the results. The discussion section addresses student preferences along with student learning of these different instructional methods. Overall, instructional methods with the highest preference also deliver the highest levels of student learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63963/001c.138824
Primary Topic
Management and Marketing Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Gen Z Marketing Student Preference for Different Instructional Methods

Michael Scott Garver, Steven H. Dahlquist, Richard L Divine
Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education
Management and Marketing Education
article

Analysis of Gen Z Marketing Student Preference for Different Instructional Methods

Michael Scott Garver, Steven H. Dahlquist, Richard L Divine
article en

Abstract

Marketing student preference for six different instructional methods was determined using a choice-based conjoint analysis. Each instructional method was a significant determinant of students’ choice of a given class, but the six methods varied significantly in terms of their importance weights. Results of conjoint analysis indicate that the three most preferred drivers of student choice for a marketing class are: 1) it employs a flipped classroom, 2) its class sessions are interactive and hands-on, rather than lecture-based and 3) it has a moderate, rather than a heavy workload. Latent class cluster analysis was conducted, and four preference-based segments were identified. These segments highlight the different preferences of students and add more insight into the results. The discussion section addresses student preferences along with student learning of these different instructional methods. Overall, instructional methods with the highest preference also deliver the highest levels of student learning.

Journal for Advancement of Marketing EducationVol. 33(1)
Central Michigan University (US), Grand Valley State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Management and Marketing Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.