Rebuttal to: Hakim and Narouze; To trial pending strong evidence for otherwise
We thank Hakim and Narouze[1][1] for their thoughtful review of our study[2][2] and for highlighting the importance of statistical rigor in assessing peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) approaches. Firstly, it is important to note that our retrospective multicenter analysis was designed explicitly as
Authors
- Ryan S. D’Souza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4601-9837)
- Nasir Hussain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0353-1002)
- Yue Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3617-2037)
- Jay Karri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0520-9516)
Institutions
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- WinnMed (US)
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
- Maryland Dermatology Laser Skin and Vein Institute (US)
- Techtronic Industries (United States) (US)
- Orthopedic One (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
- Published
- 2025-11-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-107412
- Primary Topic
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00