Dual-method analysis of microplastics in lake and wastewater treatment effluents: comparison of micro-FTIR and differential scanning calorimetry technique

• FTIR and DSC show similar MPs pollution trends, but their specific results differ. • Total MPs concentrations ranges 0.38 - 4.0 no./L (μFTIR) and 0.38 - 5.34 μg/L (DSC). • μFTIR detect various polymer types and size, but mass estimation lead overestimation. • DSC offers superior quantification of MPs mass with treated large volume (500–1000 L). • Dual analysis enabled balanced representation of MPs pollution in water environment. Microplastics (MPs) pollution presents a significant analytical challenge in aquatic environments. This study compares two analytical techniques for MPs detection, spectroscopic analysis using micro-Fourier transform infrared (μFTIR) spectroscopy and thermal analysis using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), to comprehensively assess MPs. Samples were collected in March and October 2024 from Uiam Lake and effluents discharged by two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Chuncheon, South Korea. In both sampling periods, MPs concentrations ranged from 0.38 to 4.0 no./L (μFTIR) and 0.38 to 5.34 μg/L (DSC). The detected MPs varied in size (17–5000 μm), color, and were mostly fragmented. The highest concentration and largest MPs were observed at the most downstream site of Uiam Lake, indicating MPs accumulation primarily through nonpoint sources and significant influence from anthropogenic contamination. Using both μFTIR and DSC analyses, PMMA, PET, and PS MPs were commonly detected in Uiam Lake and effluents from both WWTPs consistently contained PMMA, PET, PS, and PE MPs. However, certain polymers were detected by only one of the methods. This discrepancy caused by differences in sample volumes, 500–1000 L for DSC and 5–10 L for μFTIR analysis, as well as the limited range of polymers that can be analyzed by DSC. Therefore, while μFTIR is more effective for identifying a broad range of polymer types, DSC offers superior quantification of MPs mass. A dual analytical strategy thus provides a balanced representation of both particle- and mass-based data, which is essential for accurate environmental assessment and source attribution of MPs pollution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Research X
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2025.100460
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual-method analysis of microplastics in lake and wastewater treatment effluents: comparison of micro-FTIR and differential scanning calorimetry technique

Soyeong Yoon, Kwang Suk Lim, Suk‐Jin Ha, Taesoon Jang et al.
Water Research X
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Dual-method analysis of microplastics in lake and wastewater treatment effluents: comparison of micro-FTIR and differential scanning calorimetry technique

Soyeong Yoon, Kwang Suk Lim, Suk‐Jin Ha, Taesoon Jang, M. H. Lee, Hyun‐Ouk Kim, Jeong‐Ann Park, Jooyoung Lee, Jin-Hyuk Choi, Na‐Rae Kim
article en

Abstract

• FTIR and DSC show similar MPs pollution trends, but their specific results differ. • Total MPs concentrations ranges 0.38 - 4.0 no./L (μFTIR) and 0.38 - 5.34 μg/L (DSC). • μFTIR detect various polymer types and size, but mass estimation lead overestimation. • DSC offers superior quantification of MPs mass with treated large volume (500–1000 L). • Dual analysis enabled balanced representation of MPs pollution in water environment. Microplastics (MPs) pollution presents a significant analytical challenge in aquatic environments. This study compares two analytical techniques for MPs detection, spectroscopic analysis using micro-Fourier transform infrared (μFTIR) spectroscopy and thermal analysis using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), to comprehensively assess MPs. Samples were collected in March and October 2024 from Uiam Lake and effluents discharged by two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Chuncheon, South Korea. In both sampling periods, MPs concentrations ranged from 0.38 to 4.0 no./L (μFTIR) and 0.38 to 5.34 μg/L (DSC). The detected MPs varied in size (17–5000 μm), color, and were mostly fragmented. The highest concentration and largest MPs were observed at the most downstream site of Uiam Lake, indicating MPs accumulation primarily through nonpoint sources and significant influence from anthropogenic contamination. Using both μFTIR and DSC analyses, PMMA, PET, and PS MPs were commonly detected in Uiam Lake and effluents from both WWTPs consistently contained PMMA, PET, PS, and PE MPs. However, certain polymers were detected by only one of the methods. This discrepancy caused by differences in sample volumes, 500–1000 L for DSC and 5–10 L for μFTIR analysis, as well as the limited range of polymers that can be analyzed by DSC. Therefore, while μFTIR is more effective for identifying a broad range of polymer types, DSC offers superior quantification of MPs mass. A dual analytical strategy thus provides a balanced representation of both particle- and mass-based data, which is essential for accurate environmental assessment and source attribution of MPs pollution.

Water Research XVol. 30
Kangwon National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.