Microstructure and (De)lithiation Front in a 400 µm Thick 3D‐Printed LiFePO <sub>4</sub> Electrode

The progress towards more sustainable practices for the manufacturing of lithium‐ion batteries has lagged behind the faster evolution in the Li‐insertion materials and electrolyte formulations. 3D printing is a potential alternative coating method that can enable the preparation of high‐loading electrodes with a good control over the microstructural details and spatial distribution of the electrode components. Herein, a high loading LiFePO 4 electrode with an areal loading of 30 mg cm −2 is reported. This is achieved by 3D printing of an aqueous ink with an optimal formulation including carbon microfiber and carbon black as conductive additives and carboxymethyl cellulose and poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate as binders. The electrodes are characterized for the electronic and ionic percolation to substantiate the superior performance of the 3D‐printed electrodes compared to their conventionally doctor‐blade coated counterparts. The in situ µ‐x‐ray diffraction (XRD) imaging of the electrodes is performed to visualize the in‐ and through‐plane solid‐state Li concentration profiles within the 400 µm thick 3D‐printed electrodes during cycling at C/5 and 1C. The concentration‐gradient maps, once analyzed together with the tortuosity data, and physics‐based simulations, identify the synergistic effect of an enhanced ionic transport and higher active surface‐area of the 3D‐printed electrodes to be the cause of their superior performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Batteries & Supercaps
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202500577
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microstructure and (De)lithiation Front in a 400 µm Thick 3D‐Printed LiFePO 4 Electrode

Hamid Hamed, Mahsa Mohammad, Jasper Lefevere, Mohammadhosein Safari et al.
Batteries & Supercaps
Advancements in Battery Materials
article

Microstructure and (De)lithiation Front in a 400 µm Thick 3D‐Printed LiFePO 4 Electrode

Hamid Hamed, Mahsa Mohammad, Jasper Lefevere, Mohammadhosein Safari, Quentin Jacquet, Marta Mirolo, Sandrine Lyonnard, Gozde Oney, Yuan‐Chi Yang, An T. Hardy, Yoran De Vos, Samuel Tardif, Saeed Yari, Jan D’Haen, Tu T.T. Nguyen, Sébastien Sallard, Jakub Dnrec
article en

Abstract

The progress towards more sustainable practices for the manufacturing of lithium‐ion batteries has lagged behind the faster evolution in the Li‐insertion materials and electrolyte formulations. 3D printing is a potential alternative coating method that can enable the preparation of high‐loading electrodes with a good control over the microstructural details and spatial distribution of the electrode components. Herein, a high loading LiFePO 4 electrode with an areal loading of 30 mg cm −2 is reported. This is achieved by 3D printing of an aqueous ink with an optimal formulation including carbon microfiber and carbon black as conductive additives and carboxymethyl cellulose and poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate as binders. The electrodes are characterized for the electronic and ionic percolation to substantiate the superior performance of the 3D‐printed electrodes compared to their conventionally doctor‐blade coated counterparts. The in situ µ‐x‐ray diffraction (XRD) imaging of the electrodes is performed to visualize the in‐ and through‐plane solid‐state Li concentration profiles within the 400 µm thick 3D‐printed electrodes during cycling at C/5 and 1C. The concentration‐gradient maps, once analyzed together with the tortuosity data, and physics‐based simulations, identify the synergistic effect of an enhanced ionic transport and higher active surface‐area of the 3D‐printed electrodes to be the cause of their superior performance.

Batteries & SupercapsVol. 9(3)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Imec the Netherlands (NL), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Directorate-General for Energy (BE), European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (FR), Laboratoire d’Innovation pour les Technologies des Énergies Nouvelles et les nanomatériaux (FR), CEA Grenoble (FR), Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire de Grenoble (FR), IMEC (BE), Flemish Institute for Technological Research (BE), Hasselt University (BE), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Advancements in Battery Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.