The cost‐effectiveness of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators: A systematic review of economic evaluations

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening genetic disorder affecting approximately 160 000 people worldwide. Mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene cause progressive multi-organ damage, particularly in the lungs. CFTR modulators have transformed CF care; however, their high costs raise concerns about cost-effectiveness. This systematic review examined cost-effectiveness studies of four CFTR modulators: ivacaftor (IVA), lumacaftor-ivacaftor (LUM-IVA), tezacaftor-ivacaftor (TEZ-IVA) and elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ELX-TEZ-IVA). Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and government websites were searched for studies comparing modulators with standard care or each other. Study quality was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) checklist and reporting quality using CHEERS 2022. A narrative synthesis was conducted and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were discussed. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024570006). Twenty-nine studies yielded 34 ICERs (cost per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained) across Canada, England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales and the United States. CFTR modulators produced significant clinical benefits, including improved QALYs and reduced pulmonary exacerbations, but were associated with extremely high costs, exceeding willingness-to-pay thresholds. IVA's ICERs ranged from US$536 472/QALY in Scotland to US$4 898 079/QALY in Canada, LUM-IVA's from US$378 503/QALY in Scotland to US$7 504 825/QALY in Canada, TEZ-IVA's from US$635 325/QALY in Scotland to US$1 657 332/QALY in the United States and ELX-TEZ-IVA's from US$334 047/QALY in Ireland to US$2 093 361/QALY in Canada. Sensitivity analyses indicated the need for substantial price reductions to be considered cost-effective. CFTR modulators provide substantial health benefits but pose significant financial challenges. Future research should broaden economic evaluations, consider societal impacts and explore strategies to improve affordability and access.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70331
Primary Topic
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The cost‐effectiveness of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators: A systematic review of economic evaluations

Dinko Vitezić, Andrej Belančić, Judite Gonçalves, Elisa Pineda et al.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
article

The cost‐effectiveness of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators: A systematic review of economic evaluations

Dinko Vitezić, Andrej Belančić, Judite Gonçalves, Elisa Pineda, Andrea Katrin Faour, Elvira Meni Maria Gkrinia, Ida Štimac
article en

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening genetic disorder affecting approximately 160 000 people worldwide. Mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene cause progressive multi-organ damage, particularly in the lungs. CFTR modulators have transformed CF care; however, their high costs raise concerns about cost-effectiveness. This systematic review examined cost-effectiveness studies of four CFTR modulators: ivacaftor (IVA), lumacaftor-ivacaftor (LUM-IVA), tezacaftor-ivacaftor (TEZ-IVA) and elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ELX-TEZ-IVA). Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and government websites were searched for studies comparing modulators with standard care or each other. Study quality was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) checklist and reporting quality using CHEERS 2022. A narrative synthesis was conducted and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were discussed. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024570006). Twenty-nine studies yielded 34 ICERs (cost per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained) across Canada, England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales and the United States. CFTR modulators produced significant clinical benefits, including improved QALYs and reduced pulmonary exacerbations, but were associated with extremely high costs, exceeding willingness-to-pay thresholds. IVA's ICERs ranged from US$536 472/QALY in Scotland to US$4 898 079/QALY in Canada, LUM-IVA's from US$378 503/QALY in Scotland to US$7 504 825/QALY in Canada, TEZ-IVA's from US$635 325/QALY in Scotland to US$1 657 332/QALY in the United States and ELX-TEZ-IVA's from US$334 047/QALY in Ireland to US$2 093 361/QALY in Canada. Sensitivity analyses indicated the need for substantial price reductions to be considered cost-effective. CFTR modulators provide substantial health benefits but pose significant financial challenges. Future research should broaden economic evaluations, consider societal impacts and explore strategies to improve affordability and access.

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
University of Rijeka (HR), The George Institute for Global Health (GB), Public Health England (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.