Opting out of generative AI: a behavioral experiment examining the role of education in Perplexity AI avoidance

• 51 % of participants showed avoidance in an AI-related task, 30.9 % did in an online search task. • Education, along with age, gender, and prior AI experience, were associated with AI avoidance. • The AI-related task was avoided by 74.4 % of individuals with lower education. • Individuals with lower education had lower trust and optimism and perceived fewer advantages from AI, factors also associated with AI avoidance. • Self-selection discrepancies into AI studies may amplify research biases and obscur existing educational digital inequalities. The rise of conversational AI (CAI), powered by large language models, is transforming how individuals access and interact with digital information. However, these tools may inadvertently amplify existing digital inequalities. This study investigates whether differences in formal education are associated with CAI avoidance, i.e., the deliberate refusal or discontinuation of engaging with a CAI when the opportunity and demand arises. We leverage behavioral data from an online experiment (N = 1636) where participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a control group, a traditional online search task, or a CAI task (Perplexity AI). Task avoidance (operationalized as survey abandonment or providing unrelated responses during task assignment) was significantly higher in the CAI group (51 %) compared to the search (30.9 %) and control (16.8 %) groups, with the highest CAI avoidance among participants with lower education levels (∼74.4 %). Structural equation modeling based on the theoretical framework UTAUT2 and LASSO regressions reveal that education is strongly associated with CAI avoidance, even after accounting for various cognitive and affective predictors of technology adoption. These findings underscore education’s central role in shaping AI adoption and the role of self-selection biases in AI-related research, stressing the need for inclusive design to ensure equitable access to emerging technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Telematics and Informatics
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2025.102346
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opting out of generative AI: a behavioral experiment examining the role of education in Perplexity AI avoidance

Kulshrestha Juhi, Ulloa Roberto, Kacperski Celina
1 citations
Telematics and Informatics
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
article

Opting out of generative AI: a behavioral experiment examining the role of education in Perplexity AI avoidance

Kulshrestha Juhi, Ulloa Roberto, Kacperski Celina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• 51 % of participants showed avoidance in an AI-related task, 30.9 % did in an online search task. • Education, along with age, gender, and prior AI experience, were associated with AI avoidance. • The AI-related task was avoided by 74.4 % of individuals with lower education. • Individuals with lower education had lower trust and optimism and perceived fewer advantages from AI, factors also associated with AI avoidance. • Self-selection discrepancies into AI studies may amplify research biases and obscur existing educational digital inequalities. The rise of conversational AI (CAI), powered by large language models, is transforming how individuals access and interact with digital information. However, these tools may inadvertently amplify existing digital inequalities. This study investigates whether differences in formal education are associated with CAI avoidance, i.e., the deliberate refusal or discontinuation of engaging with a CAI when the opportunity and demand arises. We leverage behavioral data from an online experiment (N = 1636) where participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a control group, a traditional online search task, or a CAI task (Perplexity AI). Task avoidance (operationalized as survey abandonment or providing unrelated responses during task assignment) was significantly higher in the CAI group (51 %) compared to the search (30.9 %) and control (16.8 %) groups, with the highest CAI avoidance among participants with lower education levels (∼74.4 %). Structural equation modeling based on the theoretical framework UTAUT2 and LASSO regressions reveal that education is strongly associated with CAI avoidance, even after accounting for various cognitive and affective predictors of technology adoption. These findings underscore education’s central role in shaping AI adoption and the role of self-selection biases in AI-related research, stressing the need for inclusive design to ensure equitable access to emerging technologies.

Telematics and InformaticsVol. 104
University of Konstanz (DE), Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.