From Autologous Bone Tissue to Bioengineered Material Solutions in Post-Traumatic Orbital Wall Reconstruction: An Overview

Orbital wall fractures are a common consequence of trauma-related craniofacial injuries. Multistage treatment and poor functional and aesthetic results render the reconstruction of an orbit extremely challenging. Advances in surgical technologies, imaging software, and biomaterials have continuously improved outcomes. The choice of materials plays a critical role in patient outcomes. Over time, the type of material involved advanced from autografts (autologous tissues such as bone grafts and muscle flaps) to allografts (metals, ceramics, plastic materials, or combinations of these materials). In this study, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest scientific insights, including the advantages and disadvantages of each material used in terms of stability, cost, safety, biocompatibility, durability, and intraoperative readiness. Bioengineered solutions seem to be the future of orbital wall reconstruction; both material and technological innovations hold promise for further advancements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16120430
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Autologous Bone Tissue to Bioengineered Material Solutions in Post-Traumatic Orbital Wall Reconstruction: An Overview

Ovidiu Lazăr, Tudor Petru Ionescu, Sînziana Istrate, Alina Popa‐Cherecheanu et al.
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

From Autologous Bone Tissue to Bioengineered Material Solutions in Post-Traumatic Orbital Wall Reconstruction: An Overview

Ovidiu Lazăr, Tudor Petru Ionescu, Sînziana Istrate, Alina Popa‐Cherecheanu, Gerhard Garhoefer, D Ionescu, Dana Galieta Mincă
article en

Abstract

Orbital wall fractures are a common consequence of trauma-related craniofacial injuries. Multistage treatment and poor functional and aesthetic results render the reconstruction of an orbit extremely challenging. Advances in surgical technologies, imaging software, and biomaterials have continuously improved outcomes. The choice of materials plays a critical role in patient outcomes. Over time, the type of material involved advanced from autografts (autologous tissues such as bone grafts and muscle flaps) to allografts (metals, ceramics, plastic materials, or combinations of these materials). In this study, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest scientific insights, including the advantages and disadvantages of each material used in terms of stability, cost, safety, biocompatibility, durability, and intraoperative readiness. Bioengineered solutions seem to be the future of orbital wall reconstruction; both material and technological innovations hold promise for further advancements.

Journal of Functional BiomaterialsVol. 16(12)
Titu Maiorescu University (RO), Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Emergency University (US), Spitalul Clinic Dr. Victor Babes (RO), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.