Acceptability, consideration, intention, and uptake of six common types of direct‐to‐consumer genetic tests in the Netherlands

While direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) has gained significant popularity, concerns persist that the public may lack adequate information and support to make well-informed decisions and understand test results. Several types of DTC-GT are on the market, each with distinct purposes and risks. The expected user population may differ per type of DTC-GT, suggesting a need for tailored information materials. Considering six different types of DTC-GT, this paper aims to identify how people's acceptability of DTC-GT and their interest in undergoing a DTC-GT within the next year (intention) and in the future (consideration) may differ depending on individuals' characteristics or the type of DTC-GT. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in April 2022 among Dutch adults. Generalized linear models determined factors associated with DTC-GT acceptability, consideration, and intention. Open-ended responses were analyzed using inductive content analysis in MaxQDA. Of 907 respondents, 34 (3.7%) had purchased a DTC-GT, with the majority opting for ancestry tests. Health-related tests had the highest consideration and intention but were deemed the least acceptable to undergo without a healthcare professional. Open-ended responses supported quantitative findings on the differences in acceptability, consideration, and intention across test types. Overall, few respondents intended to undergo a test within the next year. Factors influencing DTC-GT acceptability, consideration, and intention overlapped by the test type. The most common factors, age and education level, were both inversely associated with the outcomes. This study suggests that the Dutch public is mostly interested in health-related DTC-GT but does not find them acceptable without professional support. Ensuring that DTC-GT information is comprehensible for younger and less educated individuals is crucial. Genetic counselors could provide valuable expertise in developing these materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70142
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability, consideration, intention, and uptake of six common types of direct‐to‐consumer genetic tests in the Netherlands

Anke Wesselius, Maurice Petrus Zeegers, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Anna Roos Leerschool
Journal of Genetic Counseling
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Acceptability, consideration, intention, and uptake of six common types of direct‐to‐consumer genetic tests in the Netherlands

Anke Wesselius, Maurice Petrus Zeegers, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Anna Roos Leerschool
article en

Abstract

While direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) has gained significant popularity, concerns persist that the public may lack adequate information and support to make well-informed decisions and understand test results. Several types of DTC-GT are on the market, each with distinct purposes and risks. The expected user population may differ per type of DTC-GT, suggesting a need for tailored information materials. Considering six different types of DTC-GT, this paper aims to identify how people's acceptability of DTC-GT and their interest in undergoing a DTC-GT within the next year (intention) and in the future (consideration) may differ depending on individuals' characteristics or the type of DTC-GT. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in April 2022 among Dutch adults. Generalized linear models determined factors associated with DTC-GT acceptability, consideration, and intention. Open-ended responses were analyzed using inductive content analysis in MaxQDA. Of 907 respondents, 34 (3.7%) had purchased a DTC-GT, with the majority opting for ancestry tests. Health-related tests had the highest consideration and intention but were deemed the least acceptable to undergo without a healthcare professional. Open-ended responses supported quantitative findings on the differences in acceptability, consideration, and intention across test types. Overall, few respondents intended to undergo a test within the next year. Factors influencing DTC-GT acceptability, consideration, and intention overlapped by the test type. The most common factors, age and education level, were both inversely associated with the outcomes. This study suggests that the Dutch public is mostly interested in health-related DTC-GT but does not find them acceptable without professional support. Ensuring that DTC-GT information is comprehensible for younger and less educated individuals is crucial. Genetic counselors could provide valuable expertise in developing these materials.

Journal of Genetic CounselingVol. 34(6)
Maastricht University (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.