Disengagement of invert filling in shield tunnel induced by overlying excavation: Mechanisms and data-driven assessment

To assess how staged vertical excavation of an overlying foundation pit affects invert-filling disengagement in a shield tunnel, a three-dimensional model was developed to explicitly incorporate the invert-filling, staggered-joint segmental lining, reinforcement cages, and bolts, with diaphragm walls and steel struts serving as temporary supports. A framework based on a coordinate-mesh index was established to locate and quantify interface disengagement. Nonlinear regression and k-means clustering were employed to derive deformation-control thresholds from disengagement indicators, enabling quantitative risk assessment and supporting early-warning decisions. The main findings are as follows: (1) As excavation deepens, the tunnel-invert-filling interface undergoes three progressive stages: edge-induced tension-shear degradation, waist-centered disengagement, and central detachment with residual compressive contact at both ends. (2) Vertical settlement rebound ratio (SRR) and lateral convergence rebound ratio (CRR) exhibit nonlinear correlations with disengagement volume. Disengagement remains Stable when SRR < 6.364 % and CRR < 8.403 %; Alert when SRR is between 6.364 % and 24.572 % or CRR between 8.403 % and 23.483 %; and Critical beyond these limits. (3) Volumes of 0.0014‒0.0959 m 3 denote the Alert state, whereas volumes >0.0959 m 3 indicate severe disengagement. (4) CRR governs disengagement-volume prediction (>96 % importance), with a 95 % probability of reaching Critical state at threshold—exceeding the 91 % probability associated with SRR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2025.107316
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disengagement of invert filling in shield tunnel induced by overlying excavation: Mechanisms and data-driven assessment

Hao Jin, Zhihong Wang
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Disengagement of invert filling in shield tunnel induced by overlying excavation: Mechanisms and data-driven assessment

Hao Jin, Zhihong Wang
article en

Abstract

To assess how staged vertical excavation of an overlying foundation pit affects invert-filling disengagement in a shield tunnel, a three-dimensional model was developed to explicitly incorporate the invert-filling, staggered-joint segmental lining, reinforcement cages, and bolts, with diaphragm walls and steel struts serving as temporary supports. A framework based on a coordinate-mesh index was established to locate and quantify interface disengagement. Nonlinear regression and k-means clustering were employed to derive deformation-control thresholds from disengagement indicators, enabling quantitative risk assessment and supporting early-warning decisions. The main findings are as follows: (1) As excavation deepens, the tunnel-invert-filling interface undergoes three progressive stages: edge-induced tension-shear degradation, waist-centered disengagement, and central detachment with residual compressive contact at both ends. (2) Vertical settlement rebound ratio (SRR) and lateral convergence rebound ratio (CRR) exhibit nonlinear correlations with disengagement volume. Disengagement remains Stable when SRR < 6.364 % and CRR < 8.403 %; Alert when SRR is between 6.364 % and 24.572 % or CRR between 8.403 % and 23.483 %; and Critical beyond these limits. (3) Volumes of 0.0014‒0.0959 m 3 denote the Alert state, whereas volumes >0.0959 m 3 indicate severe disengagement. (4) CRR governs disengagement-volume prediction (>96 % importance), with a 95 % probability of reaching Critical state at threshold—exceeding the 91 % probability associated with SRR.

Tunnelling and Underground Space TechnologyVol. 169
Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.