What we’ve got here is a failure to communicate: HRM signal, lenses and refraction at Nav Canada in crisis

Purpose To analyse the HRM response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic by an organisation severely affected by the subsequent crisis, i.e. Nav Canada. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on data from a large-scale study of air navigation service providers and presents a case study of Nav Canada that is comprised of interviews, focus groups and secondary source data analysis. Findings Several lenses through which the HRM signal passes are identified that are used by the trade union to refract the HRM signal before relaying it both to stakeholders within the organisation, i.e. its members, and to stakeholders beyond the organisation, in this case, the general public and the Canadian government. Research limitations/implications Future research might explore the degree to which lenses amplify or refract the HRM signal, assessing which is most effective to ensure amplification and avoid refraction and under what conditions. Research that assesses the comparative efficacy of temporal versus among group (in)consistency or in HRM policies and HRM processes (and in particular the employment relations climate) in forming lenses is especially welcome. Longitudinal studies that explore the attitudes of workers to the HRM signal over time, explaining why changes in attitudes are observed, will be highly instructive. Practical implications The study reveals the dangers of responding to crises with alacrity and without the cooperation and buy-in (or consensus) among workers and their trade unions. Where difficult decisions have to be made, the manner in which they are made is an important influence on how trade unions and employees are likely to respond. Originality/value The HRM system strength model and HRM signalling theory are advanced via the application of the lens metaphor, by which it is possible to include aspects of the broader employment relationship that are often omitted from mainstream HRM analysis. The paper also explains the role of the trade union in the HRM signalling process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Employee Relations
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/er-11-2024-0700
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What we’ve got here is a failure to communicate: HRM signal, lenses and refraction at Nav Canada in crisis

Geraint Harvey, Peter Turnbull, Huw Thomas
Employee Relations
Labor Movements and Unions
article

What we’ve got here is a failure to communicate: HRM signal, lenses and refraction at Nav Canada in crisis

Geraint Harvey, Peter Turnbull, Huw Thomas
article en

Abstract

Purpose To analyse the HRM response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic by an organisation severely affected by the subsequent crisis, i.e. Nav Canada. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on data from a large-scale study of air navigation service providers and presents a case study of Nav Canada that is comprised of interviews, focus groups and secondary source data analysis. Findings Several lenses through which the HRM signal passes are identified that are used by the trade union to refract the HRM signal before relaying it both to stakeholders within the organisation, i.e. its members, and to stakeholders beyond the organisation, in this case, the general public and the Canadian government. Research limitations/implications Future research might explore the degree to which lenses amplify or refract the HRM signal, assessing which is most effective to ensure amplification and avoid refraction and under what conditions. Research that assesses the comparative efficacy of temporal versus among group (in)consistency or in HRM policies and HRM processes (and in particular the employment relations climate) in forming lenses is especially welcome. Longitudinal studies that explore the attitudes of workers to the HRM signal over time, explaining why changes in attitudes are observed, will be highly instructive. Practical implications The study reveals the dangers of responding to crises with alacrity and without the cooperation and buy-in (or consensus) among workers and their trade unions. Where difficult decisions have to be made, the manner in which they are made is an important influence on how trade unions and employees are likely to respond. Originality/value The HRM system strength model and HRM signalling theory are advanced via the application of the lens metaphor, by which it is possible to include aspects of the broader employment relationship that are often omitted from mainstream HRM analysis. The paper also explains the role of the trade union in the HRM signalling process.

Employee RelationsVol. 48(1)
University College Dublin (IE), Western University (CA), Western Connecticut State University (US), University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.