Trade Union Power and the Quality of Working Life Under Industry 4.0: Bargaining Outcomes in Truck and Car Components Plants

ABSTRACT This article examines how labour shapes the relationship between Industry 4.0 (I4.0) and the quality of working life (QWL) via a 2‐by‐2 comparative study in the truck and car components sub‐sectors in Belgium and the Netherlands. We conceptualize labour as a strategic agent that frames QWL challenges, mobilizes power resources and shapes bargaining outcomes. Distinct production regimes—flexibility‐driven in trucks and automation‐based in car components—generate specific discontents. Labour mobilizes associational and structural power by framing these discontents and leveraging institutional and coalition‐based resources to articulate them as actionable grievances. These processes vary by sub‐sector and country, shaping how integrative and distributive bargaining trade‐offs between QWL dimensions, including job insecurity, are negotiated in each case. By highlighting the dynamic, context‐dependent negotiations, we update labour process debates for the I4.0 context and advance power resource research by shifting focus from static capital–labour configurations of power to context‐dependent, labour‐led processes of change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Industrial Relations
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.70022
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade Union Power and the Quality of Working Life Under Industry 4.0: Bargaining Outcomes in Truck and Car Components Plants

Lander Vermeerbergen, Lynford Dor, Yennef Vereycken, Lorenzo Frangi et al.
1 citations
British Journal of Industrial Relations
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
article

Trade Union Power and the Quality of Working Life Under Industry 4.0: Bargaining Outcomes in Truck and Car Components Plants

Lander Vermeerbergen, Lynford Dor, Yennef Vereycken, Lorenzo Frangi, Valeria Pulignano, Rutherford Tod
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines how labour shapes the relationship between Industry 4.0 (I4.0) and the quality of working life (QWL) via a 2‐by‐2 comparative study in the truck and car components sub‐sectors in Belgium and the Netherlands. We conceptualize labour as a strategic agent that frames QWL challenges, mobilizes power resources and shapes bargaining outcomes. Distinct production regimes—flexibility‐driven in trucks and automation‐based in car components—generate specific discontents. Labour mobilizes associational and structural power by framing these discontents and leveraging institutional and coalition‐based resources to articulate them as actionable grievances. These processes vary by sub‐sector and country, shaping how integrative and distributive bargaining trade‐offs between QWL dimensions, including job insecurity, are negotiated in each case. By highlighting the dynamic, context‐dependent negotiations, we update labour process debates for the I4.0 context and advance power resource research by shifting focus from static capital–labour configurations of power to context‐dependent, labour‐led processes of change.

British Journal of Industrial RelationsVol. 64(1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Syracuse University (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.