Whorephobia on Dating Platforms: Ethical Platform Governance

Abstract Dating platforms generally prohibit commercial sex on their platforms and warn users that they will be deplatformed if they engage in the sex market on them. Sex workers, however, report experiencing deplatforming even when they are seeking personal, non-commercial relationships on dating platforms, which raises complaints of whorephobia. The article offers a conceptual analysis of whorephobia and proposes revisions to the concept. It argues that deplatforming sex workers qua daters constitutes wrongful discrimination on three influential accounts which raises the need for justification of the practice. Potential justifications for excluding sex workers are considered but found unpersuasive. The article finds one exception, namely, that dating platforms are morally justified in prohibiting sex work on their platforms due to an incompatibility between sex work and the dating sphere. Ultimately, morality seems to require that dating platforms permit sex workers qua daters. The paper concludes by proposing promising platform governance solutions for ethically responsible platform moderation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00996-0
Primary Topic
Sex work and related issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whorephobia on Dating Platforms: Ethical Platform Governance

Simone Sommer Degn
Philosophy & Technology
Sex work and related issues
article

Whorephobia on Dating Platforms: Ethical Platform Governance

Simone Sommer Degn
article en

Abstract

Abstract Dating platforms generally prohibit commercial sex on their platforms and warn users that they will be deplatformed if they engage in the sex market on them. Sex workers, however, report experiencing deplatforming even when they are seeking personal, non-commercial relationships on dating platforms, which raises complaints of whorephobia. The article offers a conceptual analysis of whorephobia and proposes revisions to the concept. It argues that deplatforming sex workers qua daters constitutes wrongful discrimination on three influential accounts which raises the need for justification of the practice. Potential justifications for excluding sex workers are considered but found unpersuasive. The article finds one exception, namely, that dating platforms are morally justified in prohibiting sex work on their platforms due to an incompatibility between sex work and the dating sphere. Ultimately, morality seems to require that dating platforms permit sex workers qua daters. The paper concludes by proposing promising platform governance solutions for ethically responsible platform moderation.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 38(4)
Aalborg University (DK)
University of Leeds, Aalborg Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Sex work and related issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.