Including Atmospheric Backscatter Effects in Modeling of EMIC Wave‐Driven Precipitation

Abstract Pitch‐angle diffusion is a key mechanism driving radiation belt electron loss into the atmosphere. However, traditional bounce‐averaged models, which assume complete atmospheric absorption for loss cone electrons, cannot accurately quantify the loss cone fluxes. This shortfall arises primarily from two issues: bounce‐averaging assumptions generally breakdown within the loss cone, and atmospheric backscatter effects are omitted. In this study, we use a modified bounce‐averaged pitch‐angle diffusion model to show that the inclusion of backscatter effects inside the loss cone can adequately estimate the pitch‐angle distribution of electrons inside the loss cone for the case of Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron (EMIC) wave‐driven precipitation. In this modified model, atmospheric backscatter effects are incorporated as an additional backscatter‐induced pitch‐angle diffusion (), and an attenuation of atmospheric absorption (). Here, we quantify the values of and using Geant4‐based Monte Carlo atmospheric backscatter simulation and applied to model electron precipitation driven by EMIC waves. Comparisons with ELFIN satellite observations during EMIC events reveal that the inclusion of atmospheric backscatter resolves previously reported discrepancies at electron energies . For electrons, where EMIC wave diffusion is dominant over backscatter‐induced diffusion, backscatter effects become negligible. Notably, we find that accounts for nearly all the observed enhancements in the loss cone flux, while plays a secondary role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ja034333
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Including Atmospheric Backscatter Effects in Modeling of EMIC Wave‐Driven Precipitation

Qianli Ma, Grant Berland, R. S. Selesnick, Zhi‐Gu Li et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Including Atmospheric Backscatter Effects in Modeling of EMIC Wave‐Driven Precipitation

Qianli Ma, Grant Berland, R. S. Selesnick, Zhi‐Gu Li, Luisa Capannolo, Weichao Tu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pitch‐angle diffusion is a key mechanism driving radiation belt electron loss into the atmosphere. However, traditional bounce‐averaged models, which assume complete atmospheric absorption for loss cone electrons, cannot accurately quantify the loss cone fluxes. This shortfall arises primarily from two issues: bounce‐averaging assumptions generally breakdown within the loss cone, and atmospheric backscatter effects are omitted. In this study, we use a modified bounce‐averaged pitch‐angle diffusion model to show that the inclusion of backscatter effects inside the loss cone can adequately estimate the pitch‐angle distribution of electrons inside the loss cone for the case of Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron (EMIC) wave‐driven precipitation. In this modified model, atmospheric backscatter effects are incorporated as an additional backscatter‐induced pitch‐angle diffusion (), and an attenuation of atmospheric absorption (). Here, we quantify the values of and using Geant4‐based Monte Carlo atmospheric backscatter simulation and applied to model electron precipitation driven by EMIC waves. Comparisons with ELFIN satellite observations during EMIC events reveal that the inclusion of atmospheric backscatter resolves previously reported discrepancies at electron energies . For electrons, where EMIC wave diffusion is dominant over backscatter‐induced diffusion, backscatter effects become negligible. Notably, we find that accounts for nearly all the observed enhancements in the loss cone flux, while plays a secondary role.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 130(12)
Boston University (US), West Virginia University (US), United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Michigan (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.