Mechanistic Considerations for Battery Charging Protocol Design

ABSTRACT The rapid growth of lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) applications drives the need for fast‐charging solutions ensuring speed, safety, durability, and performance. Such charging protocol design needs to be guided by mechanistic understanding of degradation pathways, ionic transport limitations, and thermal constraints. However, in practice, many charging protocols used in commercial electronics and electric vehicles (EVs) have limited mechanistic transparency. In this review, we adopt a reverse perspective by extracting mechanistic insights from practical charging protocols to inform future design. To this end, standardized fast‐charging protocols and those implemented in real‐world applications such as smartphones and EVs are analyzed to examine how their voltage–current profiles evolve with state‐of‐charge (SOC) and to reflect distinct design rationales. These features are further examined in terms of SOC‐dependent physical and chemical transformations in electrode materials, kinetic limitations such as polarization and reaction heterogeneity influenced by charging protocol design, and distinct heat generation patterns governed by protocol characteristics. Advanced characterization techniques are then highlighted for providing real‐time insights into structural transitions, diffusion kinetics, and heat evolution during fast charging. Finally, future protocol design may be informed by multiscale material modelling, real‐time sensing for adaptive control, and data‐driven optimization to support the development of advanced fast‐charging systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy Materials
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202504499
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanistic Considerations for Battery Charging Protocol Design

Jie Xiao, P. Pianetta, Jigang Zhou, Yijin Liu et al.
1 citations
Advanced Energy Materials
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
article

Mechanistic Considerations for Battery Charging Protocol Design

Jie Xiao, P. Pianetta, Jigang Zhou, Yijin Liu, Ofodike A. Ezekoye, Kejie Zhao, Junchao Xia, David Mitlin, Yanfei Li, Wenlong Li, Junmin Wang, Yixian Wang, Ayrton M. Yanyachi, Saravana Kuppan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The rapid growth of lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) applications drives the need for fast‐charging solutions ensuring speed, safety, durability, and performance. Such charging protocol design needs to be guided by mechanistic understanding of degradation pathways, ionic transport limitations, and thermal constraints. However, in practice, many charging protocols used in commercial electronics and electric vehicles (EVs) have limited mechanistic transparency. In this review, we adopt a reverse perspective by extracting mechanistic insights from practical charging protocols to inform future design. To this end, standardized fast‐charging protocols and those implemented in real‐world applications such as smartphones and EVs are analyzed to examine how their voltage–current profiles evolve with state‐of‐charge (SOC) and to reflect distinct design rationales. These features are further examined in terms of SOC‐dependent physical and chemical transformations in electrode materials, kinetic limitations such as polarization and reaction heterogeneity influenced by charging protocol design, and distinct heat generation patterns governed by protocol characteristics. Advanced characterization techniques are then highlighted for providing real‐time insights into structural transitions, diffusion kinetics, and heat evolution during fast charging. Finally, future protocol design may be informed by multiscale material modelling, real‐time sensing for adaptive control, and data‐driven optimization to support the development of advanced fast‐charging systems.

Advanced Energy MaterialsVol. 16(6)
General Motors (United States) (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US), Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (US), Walker (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), TRW Automotive (United States) (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy, Advanced Research Projects Agency, Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.