Advanced physics-informed neural networks for nonlinear partial differential equations: machine learning, gradient-enhanced and extended approach

Nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) are fundamental in describing various physical and engineering processes. In this study, two advanced deep learning frameworks the gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural network (gPINN) (Yu et al. in Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 393:114823, 2022) and the extended physics-informed neural network (XPINN) (Jagtap and Karniadakis in Commun. Comput. Phys. 28:2002–2041, 2020) are systematically employed to solve and compare the performance of two nonlinear models: the Fisher equation and the dispersive dissipative (DD) equation. The gPINN approach incorporates both the PDE residual and its gradient information within the loss function, accelerating convergence and improving local accuracy, while XPINN divides the computational domain into sub-domains and enforces interface continuity for efficient parallel training and localized error control. Neural networks with 4–10 hidden layers and 30–70 neurons per layer are implemented to approximate the solutions under well-defined initial and boundary conditions. Quantitative evaluations show that the predicted solutions closely match the analytical ones, achieving mean square errors (MSEs) between 10−2 and 10−6. Moreover, the XPINN framework reduces training time by approximately 35 percent and CPU memory usage by 25 percent compared to gPINN, confirming its superior computational efficiency and scalability. To the best of our knowledge and as supported by prior studies on PINN (Raissi, Perdikaris and Karniadakis in J. Comput. Phys. 378:686–707, 2019), gPINN (Yu et al. in Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 393:114823, 2022), and XPINN (Jagtap and Karniadakis in Commun. Comput. Phys. 28:2002–2041, 2020; Shukla, Jagtap and Karniadakis in J. Comput. Phys. 447:110683, 2021) this work presents the first integrated comparative analysis combining gPINN and XPINN for these nonlinear PDEs under identical conditions. The findings highlight the potential of hybrid neural frameworks to achieve fast, accurate, and physics-consistent approximations for complex nonlinear systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Boundary Value Problems
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-025-02182-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced physics-informed neural networks for nonlinear partial differential equations: machine learning, gradient-enhanced and extended approach

Ibtehal Alazman, Syed T. R. Rizvi, Syed Oan Abbas
2 citations
Boundary Value Problems
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
2.65
article

Advanced physics-informed neural networks for nonlinear partial differential equations: machine learning, gradient-enhanced and extended approach

Ibtehal Alazman, Syed T. R. Rizvi, Syed Oan Abbas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) are fundamental in describing various physical and engineering processes. In this study, two advanced deep learning frameworks the gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural network (gPINN) (Yu et al. in Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 393:114823, 2022) and the extended physics-informed neural network (XPINN) (Jagtap and Karniadakis in Commun. Comput. Phys. 28:2002–2041, 2020) are systematically employed to solve and compare the performance of two nonlinear models: the Fisher equation and the dispersive dissipative (DD) equation. The gPINN approach incorporates both the PDE residual and its gradient information within the loss function, accelerating convergence and improving local accuracy, while XPINN divides the computational domain into sub-domains and enforces interface continuity for efficient parallel training and localized error control. Neural networks with 4–10 hidden layers and 30–70 neurons per layer are implemented to approximate the solutions under well-defined initial and boundary conditions. Quantitative evaluations show that the predicted solutions closely match the analytical ones, achieving mean square errors (MSEs) between 10−2 and 10−6. Moreover, the XPINN framework reduces training time by approximately 35 percent and CPU memory usage by 25 percent compared to gPINN, confirming its superior computational efficiency and scalability. To the best of our knowledge and as supported by prior studies on PINN (Raissi, Perdikaris and Karniadakis in J. Comput. Phys. 378:686–707, 2019), gPINN (Yu et al. in Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 393:114823, 2022), and XPINN (Jagtap and Karniadakis in Commun. Comput. Phys. 28:2002–2041, 2020; Shukla, Jagtap and Karniadakis in J. Comput. Phys. 447:110683, 2021) this work presents the first integrated comparative analysis combining gPINN and XPINN for these nonlinear PDEs under identical conditions. The findings highlight the potential of hybrid neural frameworks to achieve fast, accurate, and physics-consistent approximations for complex nonlinear systems.

Boundary Value ProblemsVol. 2025(1)
COMSATS University Islamabad (PK), Taibah University (SA), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
2.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.