Root Cause Analysis of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Who Underwent Imaging Not Resulting in a Cancer Diagnosis in the 18 Months Prior to Diagnosis

<b>Purpose:</b> Root cause analysis carried out to establish the likely causes for pancreatic cancer not being diagnosed on previous imaging. <b>Methods:</b> Records of pancreatic cancer patients between 2016 and 2021 at two NHS providers were examined. Post-Imaging Pancreatic Cancer (PIPC) was defined as pancreatic cancer diagnosed 3-18 months after an index scan that did not report cancer. Index and diagnostic imaging were reviewed by two radiologists independently. An algorithm was developed to categorise PIPC. <b>Results:</b> 46 of 600 patients (7.7%) were classified as having PIPC, with 43 CT and 3 MRI scans undertaken 3-18 months before cancer diagnosis. The median age was 75.9 (IQR 69.6-80.2) years, with 58.7% female. PIPCs were categorised as focal lesion reported on index scan in the same pancreatic segment as diagnostic scan (2.2%); imaging changes associated with pancreatic cancer reported on index scan (17.4%); missed focal lesion or imaging changes associated with pancreatic cancer on index scan (26.1%); no focal lesion or imaging changes associated with pancreatic cancer on index scan (54.3%). Following exclusion of two patients (one declined investigations and one was too unwell), 16 of 46 (35%) PIPC patients could have been diagnosed earlier. Twelve had a missed focal lesion, and four had duct dilatation or a focal lesion reported but were inadequately investigated. <b>Conclusions:</b> Approximately three out of 100 pancreatic cancer patients could have been diagnosed earlier due to a missed lesion or inadequately investigated lesion or duct dilatation on index imaging. There are opportunities for earlier diagnosis of pancreatic cancer on imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17233770
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Root Cause Analysis of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Who Underwent Imaging Not Resulting in a Cancer Diagnosis in the 18 Months Prior to Diagnosis

Brinder S. Mahon, Raneem Albazaz, M. Makki, Keith Roberts et al.
Cancers
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Root Cause Analysis of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Who Underwent Imaging Not Resulting in a Cancer Diagnosis in the 18 Months Prior to Diagnosis

Brinder S. Mahon, Raneem Albazaz, M. Makki, Keith Roberts, Nigel John Trudgill, Sumedha Udumalagala, Justin Smyth, Nosheen Umar, Melisa Sia, Shahd A. Mohamed
article en

Abstract

<b>Purpose:</b> Root cause analysis carried out to establish the likely causes for pancreatic cancer not being diagnosed on previous imaging. <b>Methods:</b> Records of pancreatic cancer patients between 2016 and 2021 at two NHS providers were examined. Post-Imaging Pancreatic Cancer (PIPC) was defined as pancreatic cancer diagnosed 3-18 months after an index scan that did not report cancer. Index and diagnostic imaging were reviewed by two radiologists independently. An algorithm was developed to categorise PIPC. <b>Results:</b> 46 of 600 patients (7.7%) were classified as having PIPC, with 43 CT and 3 MRI scans undertaken 3-18 months before cancer diagnosis. The median age was 75.9 (IQR 69.6-80.2) years, with 58.7% female. PIPCs were categorised as focal lesion reported on index scan in the same pancreatic segment as diagnostic scan (2.2%); imaging changes associated with pancreatic cancer reported on index scan (17.4%); missed focal lesion or imaging changes associated with pancreatic cancer on index scan (26.1%); no focal lesion or imaging changes associated with pancreatic cancer on index scan (54.3%). Following exclusion of two patients (one declined investigations and one was too unwell), 16 of 46 (35%) PIPC patients could have been diagnosed earlier. Twelve had a missed focal lesion, and four had duct dilatation or a focal lesion reported but were inadequately investigated. <b>Conclusions:</b> Approximately three out of 100 pancreatic cancer patients could have been diagnosed earlier due to a missed lesion or inadequately investigated lesion or duct dilatation on index imaging. There are opportunities for earlier diagnosis of pancreatic cancer on imaging.

CancersVol. 17(23)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.