Deep sequencing reveals underestimated burden of integrase inhibitor resistance mutations in people living with HIV: a global individual patient data meta-analysis

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) have emerged as cornerstone agents in global antiretroviral therapy, though growing drug resistance presents clinical challenges. Conventional Sanger sequencing may underestimate the burden of low-frequency variants. This global meta-analysis systematically assesses the actual INSTI resistance burden among people living with HIV (PLWH) through deep sequencing technology. Our comprehensive search across Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023495535) identified studies utilizing deep sequencing for HIV integrase resistance detection. Through meta-analysis and individual participant data (IPD) analysis using HIVdb (v9.8), we differentiated pretreatment (PDR) and acquired (ADR) drug resistance, quantifying mutation rates, resistance rates, and missed detection across thresholds (above-threshold, high-frequency, low-frequency). The analysis incorporated 40 studies with 46 datapoints involving 10,778 patients. Treatment-naïve PLWH demonstrated above-threshold, high-frequency, and low-frequency mutation rates of 9.92%, 7.29%, and 5.88%, respectively, corresponding to resistance rates of 2.60%, 0.09%, and 3.90%. Treated patients showed elevated mutation rates of 19.02%, 16.64%, and 10.23%, with resistance rates reaching 16.10%, 8.67%, and 6.95%. IPD analysis of 394 mutation-positive individuals revealed 8.52% low-frequency resistance to dolutegravir and bictegravir in treatment-naïve populations, while treated patients exhibited significantly increased intermediate/high-level resistance to first-generation INSTIs, including raltegravir and elvitegravir. Conventional sequencing thresholds missed 3.61% pretreatment and 2.46% acquired drug resistance. These findings demonstrate that deep sequencing reveals substantially underestimated INSTI resistance burdens in PLWH. Although second-generation INSTIs maintain lower resistance rates, cross-resistance risks necessitate clinical vigilance. Optimized resistance surveillance strategies incorporating low-frequency mutation detection offer critical evidence for advancing global HIV control efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emerging Microbes & Infections
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2025.2595793
Citations
1
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep sequencing reveals underestimated burden of integrase inhibitor resistance mutations in people living with HIV: a global individual patient data meta-analysis

Defu Yuan, Tong Zhang, Yangyang Liu, Shanshan Liu et al.
1 citations
Emerging Microbes & Infections
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
1.40
article

Deep sequencing reveals underestimated burden of integrase inhibitor resistance mutations in people living with HIV: a global individual patient data meta-analysis

Defu Yuan, Tong Zhang, Yangyang Liu, Shanshan Liu, Lifeng Liu, Bin Su, Fei Zhao, Hongxia Yan, Bei Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) have emerged as cornerstone agents in global antiretroviral therapy, though growing drug resistance presents clinical challenges. Conventional Sanger sequencing may underestimate the burden of low-frequency variants. This global meta-analysis systematically assesses the actual INSTI resistance burden among people living with HIV (PLWH) through deep sequencing technology. Our comprehensive search across Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023495535) identified studies utilizing deep sequencing for HIV integrase resistance detection. Through meta-analysis and individual participant data (IPD) analysis using HIVdb (v9.8), we differentiated pretreatment (PDR) and acquired (ADR) drug resistance, quantifying mutation rates, resistance rates, and missed detection across thresholds (above-threshold, high-frequency, low-frequency). The analysis incorporated 40 studies with 46 datapoints involving 10,778 patients. Treatment-naïve PLWH demonstrated above-threshold, high-frequency, and low-frequency mutation rates of 9.92%, 7.29%, and 5.88%, respectively, corresponding to resistance rates of 2.60%, 0.09%, and 3.90%. Treated patients showed elevated mutation rates of 19.02%, 16.64%, and 10.23%, with resistance rates reaching 16.10%, 8.67%, and 6.95%. IPD analysis of 394 mutation-positive individuals revealed 8.52% low-frequency resistance to dolutegravir and bictegravir in treatment-naïve populations, while treated patients exhibited significantly increased intermediate/high-level resistance to first-generation INSTIs, including raltegravir and elvitegravir. Conventional sequencing thresholds missed 3.61% pretreatment and 2.46% acquired drug resistance. These findings demonstrate that deep sequencing reveals substantially underestimated INSTI resistance burdens in PLWH. Although second-generation INSTIs maintain lower resistance rates, cross-resistance risks necessitate clinical vigilance. Optimized resistance surveillance strategies incorporating low-frequency mutation detection offer critical evidence for advancing global HIV control efforts.

Emerging Microbes & InfectionsVol. 14(1)
Capital University (US), Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing YouAn Hospital (CN), Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.