Fossil bears break free from inhibitory cascade constraints at least twice ( <i>Ursus minimus</i> and <i>Ursus deningeri</i> ) caused by dietary adaptations

The inhibitory cascade model (ICM) predicts relative mammalian molar size and shows a relationship between relative molar size and diet. Bears do not follow the ICM. The aims of this study are to determine which bears, if any, adhere to the ICM, and to assess the evolution of dental development in bears to determine when and why their developmental pattern changed. Molars were measured with sliding callipers and occlusal surface area was taken as a proxy for molar size. An ICM morphospace was created with relative m2 and m3 size on the x ‐ and y ‐axes, respectively. Our findings indicate that there are two deviations from the ICM. The first takes place between Ursus boeckhi and Ursus minimus and is attributed to a reduction in inhibitors in m1. We suggest the term ‘partial ICM’ to describe the developmental pattern of bears following the first deviation, as their distribution in morphospace runs parallel to the ICM yet is shifted towards a disproportionately larger m2 associated with increased omnivory. The second break takes place between Ursus minimus and Ursus deningeri and is caused by a reduction in inhibitors in m2 resulting in a shift towards disproportionately larger m3 associated with increased herbivory. The two breaks in the established developmental pattern of the ICM are linked to dietary adaptations that can be traced to environmental change, showing the effects of the environment on development on evolutionary time scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Boreas
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bor.70044
Primary Topic
dental development and anomalies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fossil bears break free from inhibitory cascade constraints at least twice ( Ursus minimus and Ursus deningeri ) caused by dietary adaptations

Anneke H. van Heteren, A. Luft
Boreas
dental development and anomalies
article

Fossil bears break free from inhibitory cascade constraints at least twice ( Ursus minimus and Ursus deningeri ) caused by dietary adaptations

Anneke H. van Heteren, A. Luft
article en

Abstract

The inhibitory cascade model (ICM) predicts relative mammalian molar size and shows a relationship between relative molar size and diet. Bears do not follow the ICM. The aims of this study are to determine which bears, if any, adhere to the ICM, and to assess the evolution of dental development in bears to determine when and why their developmental pattern changed. Molars were measured with sliding callipers and occlusal surface area was taken as a proxy for molar size. An ICM morphospace was created with relative m2 and m3 size on the x ‐ and y ‐axes, respectively. Our findings indicate that there are two deviations from the ICM. The first takes place between Ursus boeckhi and Ursus minimus and is attributed to a reduction in inhibitors in m1. We suggest the term ‘partial ICM’ to describe the developmental pattern of bears following the first deviation, as their distribution in morphospace runs parallel to the ICM yet is shifted towards a disproportionately larger m2 associated with increased omnivory. The second break takes place between Ursus minimus and Ursus deningeri and is caused by a reduction in inhibitors in m2 resulting in a shift towards disproportionately larger m3 associated with increased herbivory. The two breaks in the established developmental pattern of the ICM are linked to dietary adaptations that can be traced to environmental change, showing the effects of the environment on development on evolutionary time scales.

Boreas
Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (DE), Bavarian Natural History Collections (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
dental development and anomalies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.