Differences in Perceived Readiness to Train Between Two Menstrual Cycle Phases in Female Athletes

Background: The menstrual cycle and associated physical symptoms, such as fatigue, mood swings, cramps, changes in energy levels, and physical discomfort, may directly influence athletic performance. Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of two stages of the menstrual cycle (early follicular & luteal phases) on recovery from exercise, as measured by heart rate variability, jumping performance, and a psychological wellness questionnaire in conjunction with current training regimes. Methods: A repeated measurement design was utilized, and statistical significance was set a priori at p < 0.05. Fifteen (n = 15) female participants (mean ± SD) for age, height, weight, body composition of 19.60 ± 1.3 years, 164.67 ± 5.78 cm, 62.44 ± 10.95 kg, and body composition 24.34 ± 6.45%), were tested in the early follicular and early luteal phase of their menstrual cycle. Results: Researchers observed significant differences in perceived readiness to train between the two phases. The early luteal phase showed a significantly higher (p < 0.01) score on the wellness questionnaire than the early follicular phase. No significant differences were found for HRV (p = 0.62), reactive strength index (p = 0.59), and vertical jump performance (p = 0.12) between the two phases. Conclusion: These results suggest that in the early luteal phase, athletes are less negatively affected by psychological factors and appear better prepared to train. However, these factors do not have a significant impact on performance metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Coaching and Sports Science
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58524/jcss.v5i1.882
Primary Topic
Exercise and Physiological Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Perceived Readiness to Train Between Two Menstrual Cycle Phases in Female Athletes

Brett Crossland, Noah Reinertz
Journal of Coaching and Sports Science
Exercise and Physiological Responses
article

Differences in Perceived Readiness to Train Between Two Menstrual Cycle Phases in Female Athletes

Brett Crossland, Noah Reinertz
article en

Abstract

Background: The menstrual cycle and associated physical symptoms, such as fatigue, mood swings, cramps, changes in energy levels, and physical discomfort, may directly influence athletic performance. Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of two stages of the menstrual cycle (early follicular & luteal phases) on recovery from exercise, as measured by heart rate variability, jumping performance, and a psychological wellness questionnaire in conjunction with current training regimes. Methods: A repeated measurement design was utilized, and statistical significance was set a priori at p < 0.05. Fifteen (n = 15) female participants (mean ± SD) for age, height, weight, body composition of 19.60 ± 1.3 years, 164.67 ± 5.78 cm, 62.44 ± 10.95 kg, and body composition 24.34 ± 6.45%), were tested in the early follicular and early luteal phase of their menstrual cycle. Results: Researchers observed significant differences in perceived readiness to train between the two phases. The early luteal phase showed a significantly higher (p < 0.01) score on the wellness questionnaire than the early follicular phase. No significant differences were found for HRV (p = 0.62), reactive strength index (p = 0.59), and vertical jump performance (p = 0.12) between the two phases. Conclusion: These results suggest that in the early luteal phase, athletes are less negatively affected by psychological factors and appear better prepared to train. However, these factors do not have a significant impact on performance metrics.

Journal of Coaching and Sports ScienceVol. 5(1)
Midwestern State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Exercise and Physiological Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.