Midwives’ Attitudes Toward Adverse Event Reporting: A Scoping Review

Background Adverse events (AEs) in healthcare are hard to talk about and report. For midwives, these events can be especially intimidating due to the challenging situations and responsibilities they face. This scoping review aims to understand how midwives view and report AEs, and what factors affect their reporting, to help improve practice, training, and policy. Materials and Methods A scoping review was done on English-language peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025, using databases including PubMed, Scopus, Wiley Online Library, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Three independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts based on defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Out of 228 studies identified, 7 met the final inclusion criteria. These studies, conducted in Ethiopia, Iran, Poland, and China, primarily used quantitative methods. Although midwives acknowledged the importance of reporting AEs, several barriers emerged: fear of blame, legal repercussions, reputational harm, lack of support, and unclear reporting systems. Workplace culture and rigid hierarchies further discouraged open communication. More experienced staff showed a greater willingness to report, often linked with better understanding and confidence. Conclusion Although the importance of reporting AEs is widely recognized, barriers still prevent midwives from doing so effectively. To create a safer and more transparent reporting environment, healthcare systems should implement clear, non-punitive reporting processes, provide better training on recognizing and disclosing errors, and adopt leadership practices that focus on learning from mistakes rather than blaming individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0974150x251392013
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Midwives’ Attitudes Toward Adverse Event Reporting: A Scoping Review

Khadizah H. Abdul‐Mumin, Hanif Abdul Rahman, Nor Amal Hazirah Hassan
Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Midwives’ Attitudes Toward Adverse Event Reporting: A Scoping Review

Khadizah H. Abdul‐Mumin, Hanif Abdul Rahman, Nor Amal Hazirah Hassan
article en

Abstract

Background Adverse events (AEs) in healthcare are hard to talk about and report. For midwives, these events can be especially intimidating due to the challenging situations and responsibilities they face. This scoping review aims to understand how midwives view and report AEs, and what factors affect their reporting, to help improve practice, training, and policy. Materials and Methods A scoping review was done on English-language peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025, using databases including PubMed, Scopus, Wiley Online Library, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Three independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts based on defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Out of 228 studies identified, 7 met the final inclusion criteria. These studies, conducted in Ethiopia, Iran, Poland, and China, primarily used quantitative methods. Although midwives acknowledged the importance of reporting AEs, several barriers emerged: fear of blame, legal repercussions, reputational harm, lack of support, and unclear reporting systems. Workplace culture and rigid hierarchies further discouraged open communication. More experienced staff showed a greater willingness to report, often linked with better understanding and confidence. Conclusion Although the importance of reporting AEs is widely recognized, barriers still prevent midwives from doing so effectively. To create a safer and more transparent reporting environment, healthcare systems should implement clear, non-punitive reporting processes, provide better training on recognizing and disclosing errors, and adopt leadership practices that focus on learning from mistakes rather than blaming individuals.

Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal
National University of Singapore (SG), Universiti Brunei Darussalam (BN), National University Health System (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Midwives’ Attitudes Toward Adverse Event Reporting: A Scoping Review — Khadizah H. Abdul‐Mumin, Hanif Abdul Rahman, et al. · Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS