Creating Connection Through the Screen: Reflections on Symmetry, Vulnerability, and the Methodological Affordances of Technology-Mediated Research on Online Misogyny

This article reflects on the methodological and emotional dimensions of conducting ethnographic research on online misogyny through technology-mediated encounters. Drawing on research about online misogyny against climate justice activists, I explore how this format, following interlocutors’ preferences, enabled forms of connection and nuance that would not have been possible if we had met in person. I argue that it afforded participants greater control over the interview environment and the visibility they granted me, reshaping power relations, enabling more symmetrical interactions, and opening up spaces for reflections on online misogyny within a wider constellation of struggles. Methodologically, the paper examines both the opportunities and risks of technology-mediated conversations when researching sensitive topics, including the potential for over-disclosure and the danger of reproducing the power dynamics we seek to avoid. Reflecting on my own positionality as a woman researching online misogyny “at home”, I discuss how embracing my own vulnerability became part of building rapport, while continuous “emotional management” was necessary to process the emotional weight of the fieldwork. I suggest that technology-mediated interactions should not be seen as a replacement for face-to-face research but as a context-sensitive method that, in certain cases, uniquely facilitates engagement with sensitive topics and vulnerable interlocutors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120683
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating Connection Through the Screen: Reflections on Symmetry, Vulnerability, and the Methodological Affordances of Technology-Mediated Research on Online Misogyny

Leah Nann
Social Sciences
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

Creating Connection Through the Screen: Reflections on Symmetry, Vulnerability, and the Methodological Affordances of Technology-Mediated Research on Online Misogyny

Leah Nann
article en

Abstract

This article reflects on the methodological and emotional dimensions of conducting ethnographic research on online misogyny through technology-mediated encounters. Drawing on research about online misogyny against climate justice activists, I explore how this format, following interlocutors’ preferences, enabled forms of connection and nuance that would not have been possible if we had met in person. I argue that it afforded participants greater control over the interview environment and the visibility they granted me, reshaping power relations, enabling more symmetrical interactions, and opening up spaces for reflections on online misogyny within a wider constellation of struggles. Methodologically, the paper examines both the opportunities and risks of technology-mediated conversations when researching sensitive topics, including the potential for over-disclosure and the danger of reproducing the power dynamics we seek to avoid. Reflecting on my own positionality as a woman researching online misogyny “at home”, I discuss how embracing my own vulnerability became part of building rapport, while continuous “emotional management” was necessary to process the emotional weight of the fieldwork. I suggest that technology-mediated interactions should not be seen as a replacement for face-to-face research but as a context-sensitive method that, in certain cases, uniquely facilitates engagement with sensitive topics and vulnerable interlocutors.

Social SciencesVol. 14(12)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.