Whatever happened to the affluent worker? Deindustrialisation, the British sociology of class and class composition in Luton, UK

This article challenges longstanding trends in the British sociology of class by drawing on insights drawn from class composition analysis and applying them to Luton, UK, the site of the original affluent worker study. Class composition has received little attention from sociologists, though neo-Weberian and cultural approaches struggle to grapple with the relationship between deindustrialisation, social reproduction, migration and class. This is because both approaches are (1) methodologically nationalist; (2) concerned primarily with subjective identification with a class, and (3) ahistorical in their theory building. Class composition offers a means of mediating between the objective and subjective dimensions of class. This demonstrates how class has changed in response to the demands for continued surplus-value creation through waged and unwaged work. Finally, the article will take a historical view of Luton’s class composition as a way to demonstrate how the approach can offer an alternative to the sociology of class.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205251381342
Primary Topic
Social and Cultural Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whatever happened to the affluent worker? Deindustrialisation, the British sociology of class and class composition in Luton, UK

Tom Hoctor, Susan Murphy
Critical Sociology
Social and Cultural Dynamics
article

Whatever happened to the affluent worker? Deindustrialisation, the British sociology of class and class composition in Luton, UK

Tom Hoctor, Susan Murphy
article en

Abstract

This article challenges longstanding trends in the British sociology of class by drawing on insights drawn from class composition analysis and applying them to Luton, UK, the site of the original affluent worker study. Class composition has received little attention from sociologists, though neo-Weberian and cultural approaches struggle to grapple with the relationship between deindustrialisation, social reproduction, migration and class. This is because both approaches are (1) methodologically nationalist; (2) concerned primarily with subjective identification with a class, and (3) ahistorical in their theory building. Class composition offers a means of mediating between the objective and subjective dimensions of class. This demonstrates how class has changed in response to the demands for continued surplus-value creation through waged and unwaged work. Finally, the article will take a historical view of Luton’s class composition as a way to demonstrate how the approach can offer an alternative to the sociology of class.

Critical Sociology
University of Bedfordshire (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Social and Cultural Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.