How gender and content shape children’s bragging expectations

Here we asked whether 6- to 10-year-olds (N = 182) have expectations regarding who brags (boys vs. girls) and about what (ability vs. resources vs. kindness). With age, children expected boys to brag more than girls. Moreover, children were more likely to expect boys to brag about their ability than their kindness. Finally, the tendency to select a boy as a braggart was more pronounced in male compared to female participants. Taken together, these results, combined with those from several exploratory analyses, suggest that children may not view bragging as a male behavior per se, but instead, as associated with males in certain contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26342-0
Primary Topic
Emotions and Moral Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How gender and content shape children’s bragging expectations

Arber Tasimi, Lesenia R. Fish
Scientific Reports
Emotions and Moral Behavior
article

How gender and content shape children’s bragging expectations

Arber Tasimi, Lesenia R. Fish
article en

Abstract

Here we asked whether 6- to 10-year-olds (N = 182) have expectations regarding who brags (boys vs. girls) and about what (ability vs. resources vs. kindness). With age, children expected boys to brag more than girls. Moreover, children were more likely to expect boys to brag about their ability than their kindness. Finally, the tendency to select a boy as a braggart was more pronounced in male compared to female participants. Taken together, these results, combined with those from several exploratory analyses, suggest that children may not view bragging as a male behavior per se, but instead, as associated with males in certain contexts.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Emory University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Emotions and Moral Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.