Dissociable sensory, motor, and visuomotor predictive functions

The visual system continuously generates predictions to guide behavior, yet how visuomotor adaptation relates to sensory detection and motor variability remains unclear. We addressed this question using joystick-based tasks: a visuomotor interception task with angular or speed perturbations, a sensory detection task, and a no-feedback motor variability task. Participants showed robust within-task responses, with angular discrepancies engaging both external (target-based) and self-referential control, while speed discrepancies primarily involved self-referential strategies. Gaze behavior reflected distinct tracking modes depending on perturbation type. However, cross-task regression analyses revealed weak associations between detection, variability, and adaptation. These dissociations were not due to noise or low power but reflected consistent performance patterns. Notably, within-subject variability exceeded between-subject variability across all tasks, highlighting trial-to-trial fluctuations as key drivers of behavior. Together, these findings support the view that predictive control relies on specialized, context-dependent mechanisms, in which task-specific computations adaptively integrate context and internal state dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Science of Learning
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00377-4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dissociable sensory, motor, and visuomotor predictive functions

Mario Treviño, Inmaculada Márquez
3 citations
npj Science of Learning
Motor Control and Adaptation
4.29
article

Dissociable sensory, motor, and visuomotor predictive functions

Mario Treviño, Inmaculada Márquez
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The visual system continuously generates predictions to guide behavior, yet how visuomotor adaptation relates to sensory detection and motor variability remains unclear. We addressed this question using joystick-based tasks: a visuomotor interception task with angular or speed perturbations, a sensory detection task, and a no-feedback motor variability task. Participants showed robust within-task responses, with angular discrepancies engaging both external (target-based) and self-referential control, while speed discrepancies primarily involved self-referential strategies. Gaze behavior reflected distinct tracking modes depending on perturbation type. However, cross-task regression analyses revealed weak associations between detection, variability, and adaptation. These dissociations were not due to noise or low power but reflected consistent performance patterns. Notably, within-subject variability exceeded between-subject variability across all tasks, highlighting trial-to-trial fluctuations as key drivers of behavior. Together, these findings support the view that predictive control relies on specialized, context-dependent mechanisms, in which task-specific computations adaptively integrate context and internal state dynamics.

npj Science of LearningVol. 10(1)
Universidad de Guadalajara (MX), Universidad de la Ciénega (MX)
Universidad de Guadalajara
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Motor Control and Adaptation
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dissociable sensory, motor, and visuomotor predictive functions — Mario Treviño, Inmaculada Márquez · npj Science of Learning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS