Gender Differences in Lecturers’ Competency and Use of Learning Management Systems at a University of Technology in South Africa

Despite the increasing integration of digital tools, female lecturers exhibit a lack of confidence in their digital competencies, which adversely affects their engagement with LMS platforms. Understanding the cause of this disparity is the gap this study intends to fill. A simple random sample of 121 participants from the Faculty of Science was selected, employing a mixed-methods approach with a convergent parallel design. Data were gathered through an online LMS survey and interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests and chi-square tests, while qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis with Atlas.ti. The results indicated that 48.7% of female lecturers showed a stronger inclination towards adaptation, whereas male lecturers were more evenly divided between adaptation and appreciation. Most lecturers reported positive experiences with LMS tools. This study advocates for targeted professional development programs to enhance digital competencies and promote collaboration. Universities should adopt and integrate feminist pedagogy principles into their digital teaching practices to create more inclusive and equitable online learning environments. By addressing gender disparities, the research aims to contribute to achieving United Nations’ fifth Sustainable Development Goal on gender equity in higher education, ultimately improving student engagement and learning outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121595
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Differences in Lecturers’ Competency and Use of Learning Management Systems at a University of Technology in South Africa

Sibongile Simelane-Mnisi, Johnny Mafika Mthimunye
Education Sciences
Digital literacy in education
article

Gender Differences in Lecturers’ Competency and Use of Learning Management Systems at a University of Technology in South Africa

Sibongile Simelane-Mnisi, Johnny Mafika Mthimunye
article en

Abstract

Despite the increasing integration of digital tools, female lecturers exhibit a lack of confidence in their digital competencies, which adversely affects their engagement with LMS platforms. Understanding the cause of this disparity is the gap this study intends to fill. A simple random sample of 121 participants from the Faculty of Science was selected, employing a mixed-methods approach with a convergent parallel design. Data were gathered through an online LMS survey and interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests and chi-square tests, while qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis with Atlas.ti. The results indicated that 48.7% of female lecturers showed a stronger inclination towards adaptation, whereas male lecturers were more evenly divided between adaptation and appreciation. Most lecturers reported positive experiences with LMS tools. This study advocates for targeted professional development programs to enhance digital competencies and promote collaboration. Universities should adopt and integrate feminist pedagogy principles into their digital teaching practices to create more inclusive and equitable online learning environments. By addressing gender disparities, the research aims to contribute to achieving United Nations’ fifth Sustainable Development Goal on gender equity in higher education, ultimately improving student engagement and learning outcomes.

Education SciencesVol. 15(12)
Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
Tshwane University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Digital literacy in education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.