Predicting the response of triple negative breast cancer to neoadjuvant systemic therapy via biology-based modeling and habitat analysis

Despite being the standard-of-care treatment, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) attains a complete response only in approximately half of the patients with triple negative breast cancer. Thus, methods to predict and optimize patient response to NAT are needed. Previously, we employed patient-specific MRI data to calibrate a biology-based mathematical model that describes cell movement, proliferation, and death due to drug at the tumor level and cell proliferation at an image voxel level. We now extend our approach by using MRI data to group voxels into "habitats" whereby tumor cells of a habitat share the same proliferation. With this approach, we now calibrate habitat-informed proliferation rates for each habitat rather than local proliferation rates. When comparing error in tumor cell number and volume at the time of calibration, the local calibration has significantly (p < 0.05) lower error than the habitat-informed calibration. However, the habitat-informed predictions of a future timepoint have significantly lower error than the local predictions. Compared to the local calibration, the habitat-informed calibration also requires fewer parameters, reducing the calibration time by a factor of 17. These results suggest that a habitat-informed calibration can provide both accurate and efficient predictions of breast cancer response to NAT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25989-z
Primary Topic
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting the response of triple negative breast cancer to neoadjuvant systemic therapy via biology-based modeling and habitat analysis

Chengyue Wu, Gaiane M. Rauch, Clinton Yam, Casey E. Stowers et al.
Scientific Reports
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
article

Predicting the response of triple negative breast cancer to neoadjuvant systemic therapy via biology-based modeling and habitat analysis

Chengyue Wu, Gaiane M. Rauch, Clinton Yam, Casey E. Stowers, Jingfei Ma, Thomas E. Yankeelov
article en

Abstract

Despite being the standard-of-care treatment, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) attains a complete response only in approximately half of the patients with triple negative breast cancer. Thus, methods to predict and optimize patient response to NAT are needed. Previously, we employed patient-specific MRI data to calibrate a biology-based mathematical model that describes cell movement, proliferation, and death due to drug at the tumor level and cell proliferation at an image voxel level. We now extend our approach by using MRI data to group voxels into "habitats" whereby tumor cells of a habitat share the same proliferation. With this approach, we now calibrate habitat-informed proliferation rates for each habitat rather than local proliferation rates. When comparing error in tumor cell number and volume at the time of calibration, the local calibration has significantly (p < 0.05) lower error than the habitat-informed calibration. However, the habitat-informed predictions of a future timepoint have significantly lower error than the local predictions. Compared to the local calibration, the habitat-informed calibration also requires fewer parameters, reducing the calibration time by a factor of 17. These results suggest that a habitat-informed calibration can provide both accurate and efficient predictions of breast cancer response to NAT.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Livestrong Foundation (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation, Conquer Cancer Foundation, Amgen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, Gilead Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Astellas Pharma, Genentech, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.