Clinical outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal subepithelial tumors

Esophageal submucosal tumors are increasingly identified through routine upper endoscopy, often performed as part of health screenings. Although many of these lesions are benign, some have malignant potential, necessitating accurate diagnosis and appropriate resection. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has gained attention as a novel technique that enables mucosal resection without submucosal injection, offering advantages in terms of safety and efficacy. However, data regarding its use for esophageal submucosal tumors are limited. This retrospective single-center study included 31 patients who underwent UEMRs for esophageal submucosal tumors between 2020 and 2024. The inclusion criteria were lesions <15 mm in diameter, confined to the submucosal layer, as confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound. Clinical variables, including age, sex, lesion characteristics, procedural details, and histopathological findings, were reviewed. Outcomes included en bloc and pathological complete (R0) resection rates, complications, and recurrence during follow-up. Among the 31 patients (mean age: 57.0 ± 12.5 years; 61% male), the most common lesion location was the lower esophagus (45.2%). Most lesions measured 5 to 10 mm (51.6%). Histopathologic diagnoses included leiomyomas (38.7%), granular cell tumors (32.3%), inflammatory fibroid polyps, and other benign entities. All lesions were resected en bloc using UEMR, with a 100% R0 resection rate. No major complications, including bleeding or perforation, occurred. During a follow-up period of up to 37 months, no recurrence was observed, including in cases of granular cell tumors or adenoid cystic carcinomas. UEMR is a safe and effective technique for managing esophageal submucosal tumors, demonstrating high en bloc and R0 resection rates with no major complications. These findings support UEMR as a favorable option for the resection of small esophageal submucosal tumors, providing a rationale for further prospective studies comparing UEMR with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, band ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000046121
Primary Topic
Tumors and Oncological Cases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal subepithelial tumors

Jin Ook Jang, Soo Bin Synn, Cheol Woong Choi, Dae Gon Ryu et al.
Medicine
Tumors and Oncological Cases
article

Clinical outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal subepithelial tumors

Jin Ook Jang, Soo Bin Synn, Cheol Woong Choi, Dae Gon Ryu, Su Bum Park, Su Jin Kim, Woo Jin Kim, Cheol Min Lee
article en

Abstract

Esophageal submucosal tumors are increasingly identified through routine upper endoscopy, often performed as part of health screenings. Although many of these lesions are benign, some have malignant potential, necessitating accurate diagnosis and appropriate resection. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has gained attention as a novel technique that enables mucosal resection without submucosal injection, offering advantages in terms of safety and efficacy. However, data regarding its use for esophageal submucosal tumors are limited. This retrospective single-center study included 31 patients who underwent UEMRs for esophageal submucosal tumors between 2020 and 2024. The inclusion criteria were lesions <15 mm in diameter, confined to the submucosal layer, as confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound. Clinical variables, including age, sex, lesion characteristics, procedural details, and histopathological findings, were reviewed. Outcomes included en bloc and pathological complete (R0) resection rates, complications, and recurrence during follow-up. Among the 31 patients (mean age: 57.0 ± 12.5 years; 61% male), the most common lesion location was the lower esophagus (45.2%). Most lesions measured 5 to 10 mm (51.6%). Histopathologic diagnoses included leiomyomas (38.7%), granular cell tumors (32.3%), inflammatory fibroid polyps, and other benign entities. All lesions were resected en bloc using UEMR, with a 100% R0 resection rate. No major complications, including bleeding or perforation, occurred. During a follow-up period of up to 37 months, no recurrence was observed, including in cases of granular cell tumors or adenoid cystic carcinomas. UEMR is a safe and effective technique for managing esophageal submucosal tumors, demonstrating high en bloc and R0 resection rates with no major complications. These findings support UEMR as a favorable option for the resection of small esophageal submucosal tumors, providing a rationale for further prospective studies comparing UEMR with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, band ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

MedicineVol. 104(47)
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Tumors and Oncological Cases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.