Finite element analysis of the treatment of infant developmental dysplasia of the hip by traditional Chinese medical physical manipulation

This study used finite element analysis to biomechanically evaluate a traditional Chinese medicine physical manipulation for the reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infants. An infant-specific 3-dimensional finite element model of the hip, incorporating the pelvic bones and Y-cartilage, was developed. As direct segmentation of infant hip cartilage from clinical magnetic resonance imaging was unreliable, a validated scaling method based on an adult model was employed. A dynamic analysis compared the stress distribution and contact area in the acetabulum and femoral head during a simulated reduction maneuver across different abduction angles (40°, 60°, and 80°), chosen to represent the clinically applied range. A safe acetabular contact pressure limit was defined as ≤2.1 MPa based on published data from healthy infant hips. The results indicated that stress and contact area varied significantly with the abduction angle. The 60° abduction angle demonstrated the most favorable biomechanical profile, yielding the largest acetabular contact area of 216.8 mm2 and a peak acetabular contact pressure of 0.727 MPa, which was well within the safe limit. In contrast, an 80° abduction angle led to hazardous stress concentrations, with the peak acetabular contact pressure reaching 3.84 MPa, exceeding the safe limit, and a doubling of the peak femoral head pressure compared to the 60° position. The biomechanical analysis suggests that an abduction angle of 60° during the manipulation provides a safer and more effective profile for the initial reduction of DDH compared to higher angles, promoting a uniform stress distribution conducive to acetabular development while minimizing risks of cartilage injury and vascular compromise. The finite element analysis indicates that this traditional Chinese medicine physical manipulation is a feasible treatment approach for infant DDH, and the identified optimal 60° abduction may offer a biomechanical advantage over the often higher, sustained abduction angles used in the Pavlik harness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000046142
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finite element analysis of the treatment of infant developmental dysplasia of the hip by traditional Chinese medical physical manipulation

Steven Lim Cho Pei, Xuewen Song, Fangjun Yang, Chen Zhang et al.
Medicine
Hip disorders and treatments
article

Finite element analysis of the treatment of infant developmental dysplasia of the hip by traditional Chinese medical physical manipulation

Steven Lim Cho Pei, Xuewen Song, Fangjun Yang, Chen Zhang, Miaomiao Liu, Huaming Wang, Jin Huang, Xiaojun Sun
article en

Abstract

This study used finite element analysis to biomechanically evaluate a traditional Chinese medicine physical manipulation for the reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infants. An infant-specific 3-dimensional finite element model of the hip, incorporating the pelvic bones and Y-cartilage, was developed. As direct segmentation of infant hip cartilage from clinical magnetic resonance imaging was unreliable, a validated scaling method based on an adult model was employed. A dynamic analysis compared the stress distribution and contact area in the acetabulum and femoral head during a simulated reduction maneuver across different abduction angles (40°, 60°, and 80°), chosen to represent the clinically applied range. A safe acetabular contact pressure limit was defined as ≤2.1 MPa based on published data from healthy infant hips. The results indicated that stress and contact area varied significantly with the abduction angle. The 60° abduction angle demonstrated the most favorable biomechanical profile, yielding the largest acetabular contact area of 216.8 mm2 and a peak acetabular contact pressure of 0.727 MPa, which was well within the safe limit. In contrast, an 80° abduction angle led to hazardous stress concentrations, with the peak acetabular contact pressure reaching 3.84 MPa, exceeding the safe limit, and a doubling of the peak femoral head pressure compared to the 60° position. The biomechanical analysis suggests that an abduction angle of 60° during the manipulation provides a safer and more effective profile for the initial reduction of DDH compared to higher angles, promoting a uniform stress distribution conducive to acetabular development while minimizing risks of cartilage injury and vascular compromise. The finite element analysis indicates that this traditional Chinese medicine physical manipulation is a feasible treatment approach for infant DDH, and the identified optimal 60° abduction may offer a biomechanical advantage over the often higher, sustained abduction angles used in the Pavlik harness.

MedicineVol. 104(47)
Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.