Smarter cycling, safer cycling? Acceptance of advanced cyclist assistance systems in 19 European countries

As cycling grows in popularity as a sustainable transport mode in Europe, cyclist safety has become a priority. Advanced Cyclist Assistance Systems (ACAS), inspired by Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), offer potential safety improvements but remain underexplored. This study examines ACAS acceptance among 5,991 cyclists from 19 European countries, focusing on public perceptions and adoption drivers. Participants evaluated various ACAS types-crash prevention, visibility enhancement, environmental monitoring, and post-crash assistance-based on safety, usability, and reliability. Acceptance varied across countries, with higher rates in areas with strong cycling infrastructure. Safety and reliability were universally valued, though gender differences emerged: women prioritised safety and visibility, while men favoured usability and added features. The findings highlight the importance of infrastructure, reliable technology, and awareness efforts to promote adoption. Policymakers and developers can use these insights to tailor ACAS innovations, ultimately enhancing cycling safety and supporting the broader development of smart, cyclist-focused technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ergonomics
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2588164
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smarter cycling, safer cycling? Acceptance of advanced cyclist assistance systems in 19 European countries

Trond Nordfjærn, Предраг Брлек, Steve O’Hern, Jozef Gnap et al.
2 citations
Ergonomics
Traffic and Road Safety
2.61
article

Smarter cycling, safer cycling? Acceptance of advanced cyclist assistance systems in 19 European countries

Trond Nordfjærn, Предраг Брлек, Steve O’Hern, Jozef Gnap, Javier Gené‐Morales, Milad Mehdizadeh, Katarzyna Gdowska, Nora Studer, Žermēna Vazne, Dimitrios Nalmpantis, Ksenia Shubenkova, Mette Møller, Dorothea Schaffner, Sergio A. Useche, Mihai Răzvan Niţă, Mile Ćavar, Giuseppe Guido, Sergio Traficante, Katrina Volgemute, F. Alonso
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As cycling grows in popularity as a sustainable transport mode in Europe, cyclist safety has become a priority. Advanced Cyclist Assistance Systems (ACAS), inspired by Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), offer potential safety improvements but remain underexplored. This study examines ACAS acceptance among 5,991 cyclists from 19 European countries, focusing on public perceptions and adoption drivers. Participants evaluated various ACAS types-crash prevention, visibility enhancement, environmental monitoring, and post-crash assistance-based on safety, usability, and reliability. Acceptance varied across countries, with higher rates in areas with strong cycling infrastructure. Safety and reliability were universally valued, though gender differences emerged: women prioritised safety and visibility, while men favoured usability and added features. The findings highlight the importance of infrastructure, reliable technology, and awareness efforts to promote adoption. Policymakers and developers can use these insights to tailor ACAS innovations, ultimately enhancing cycling safety and supporting the broader development of smart, cyclist-focused technologies.

Ergonomics
Jagiellonian University (PL), University of Leeds (GB), University of Bucharest (RO), University of Mostar (BA), Universitat de València (ES), University of Zagreb (HR), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH), University of Žilina (SK), Latvian Academy of Sport Education (LV), Riga Stradiņš University (LV), Krakow Cardiovascular Research Institute (PL), University of Calabria (IT), AGH University of Krakow (PL), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Traffic and Road Safety
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.