Prediction of 180-day post-admission’s GOS in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage based on explainable machine learning technology

Effective outcome prediction is crucial in the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH). This study developed machine learning models to predict the 180-day Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score using clinical parameters and identify key prognostic factors. All patients with SICH were randomized into training and internal validation cohortsin a 7:3 ratio. After the most relevant variables were selected by the SVM-RFE and LASSO algorithms, the predictive efficiency of the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), XGBoost, random forest (RF), and lightgbm models was evaluated through an exhaustive suite of performance indicators. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) methods were engaged to explain the top-performingmodel. The model was developed for 215 patients. The GBDT model showed stable performance in predictive power in both the internal and external validation cohorts, with the following metrics assessed in the internal test set: AUROC (0.865 ± 0.069); AUPRC (0.834 ± 0.090); accuracy (0.822 ± 0.065), F1 (0.716 ± 0.114); precision (0.787 ± 0.147); recall (0.676 ± 0.138); sensitivity (0.902 ± 0.070) specificity, (0.787 ± 0.147). The GBDT model was assessed in the outer test set with the following metrics: AUROC: 0.785 (0.752, 0.832), AUPRC: 0.693 (0.649, 0.762), accuracy: 0.770 (0.739, 0.807), F1: 0.769 (0.738, 0.806), precision: 0.769 (0.738, 0.806), recall: 0.770 (0.739, 0.807), sensitivity: 0.826 (0.793, 0.863), Specificity: 0.710 (0.662, 0.761). We found that the blood platelet count, serum calcium level, and hemorrhage in the left occipital lobe, right temporal lobe, and right parietal lobe were the 5 most important features for GOS prediction in the GBDT and RF models. The outcomes of SHAP and LIME were consistent with those of previous studies. The GBDT model exhibited the best prediction performance. Moreover, it has the potential to aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and guiding clinical decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000045402
Primary Topic
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of 180-day post-admission’s GOS in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage based on explainable machine learning technology

Yuchen Jiang, Chengpeng Zhan, Xin-Jiang Yan, Guofeng Yu et al.
Medicine
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
article

Prediction of 180-day post-admission’s GOS in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage based on explainable machine learning technology

Yuchen Jiang, Chengpeng Zhan, Xin-Jiang Yan, Guofeng Yu, Mengyao Wang, Xin Zhou, Lijuan Xu, Hongwu Li, Cuijie Yuan
article en

Abstract

Effective outcome prediction is crucial in the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH). This study developed machine learning models to predict the 180-day Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score using clinical parameters and identify key prognostic factors. All patients with SICH were randomized into training and internal validation cohortsin a 7:3 ratio. After the most relevant variables were selected by the SVM-RFE and LASSO algorithms, the predictive efficiency of the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), XGBoost, random forest (RF), and lightgbm models was evaluated through an exhaustive suite of performance indicators. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) methods were engaged to explain the top-performingmodel. The model was developed for 215 patients. The GBDT model showed stable performance in predictive power in both the internal and external validation cohorts, with the following metrics assessed in the internal test set: AUROC (0.865 ± 0.069); AUPRC (0.834 ± 0.090); accuracy (0.822 ± 0.065), F1 (0.716 ± 0.114); precision (0.787 ± 0.147); recall (0.676 ± 0.138); sensitivity (0.902 ± 0.070) specificity, (0.787 ± 0.147). The GBDT model was assessed in the outer test set with the following metrics: AUROC: 0.785 (0.752, 0.832), AUPRC: 0.693 (0.649, 0.762), accuracy: 0.770 (0.739, 0.807), F1: 0.769 (0.738, 0.806), precision: 0.769 (0.738, 0.806), recall: 0.770 (0.739, 0.807), sensitivity: 0.826 (0.793, 0.863), Specificity: 0.710 (0.662, 0.761). We found that the blood platelet count, serum calcium level, and hemorrhage in the left occipital lobe, right temporal lobe, and right parietal lobe were the 5 most important features for GOS prediction in the GBDT and RF models. The outcomes of SHAP and LIME were consistent with those of previous studies. The GBDT model exhibited the best prediction performance. Moreover, it has the potential to aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and guiding clinical decision making.

MedicineVol. 104(47)
Quzhou City People's Hospital (CN), Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Quzhou University (CN), Anshan Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.