The impact of spinal manipulation on lumbar proprioception and its link to pain relief: a randomized controlled trial

Manual therapy, such as spinal manipulation (SM), is commonly used to treat non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP), although its mechanisms remain poorly understood. It has been hypothesized that the mechanical forces applied during spinal manipulation (SM) influence proprioceptive function, which is often impaired in patients with CLBP. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a single SM intervention on lumbar proprioceptive function and its potential relationship with analgesic effects in patients with CLBP. In a single-blind randomized controlled trial, data from 142 adults with or without CLBP were analyzed after random assignment to receive lumbar spinal manipulation (LMANIP), lumbar mobilization (LMOB), or no intervention (NI). The primary outcome was the proprioceptive weighting (PW) ratio, which reflects the central nervous system’s preferred source of proprioceptive input for balance control, specifically from the lumbar and ankle muscles. PW ratios were assessed immediately before and after intervention by analyzing postural sway changes during vibrotactile stimulation (60 Hz). PW changed in both healthy participants and patients after the intervention, with a significantly stronger lumbar-steered PW following LMANIP compared to NI (β = − 0.047, t(422) = − 2.71, p = 0.007) and LMOB (β = − 0.039, t(422) = − 2.17, p = 0.030). Moreover, LMANIP was particularly effective in reducing pain in patients with stronger lumbar-steered PW before intervention (p < 0.017). These findings suggest that a single SM session enhances proprioceptive input from the lumbar muscles and that the strength of the analgesic effect is associated with the baseline PW status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25985-3
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of spinal manipulation on lumbar proprioception and its link to pain relief: a randomized controlled trial

Petra Schweinhardt, Claudio Städler, Magdalena Suter, Michael L. Meier et al.
Scientific Reports
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

The impact of spinal manipulation on lumbar proprioception and its link to pain relief: a randomized controlled trial

Petra Schweinhardt, Claudio Städler, Magdalena Suter, Michael L. Meier, Luana Nyirö, Lukas Connolly, Monika Dörig, N.E.A. Vogel, Giovanna John-Cecere
article en

Abstract

Manual therapy, such as spinal manipulation (SM), is commonly used to treat non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP), although its mechanisms remain poorly understood. It has been hypothesized that the mechanical forces applied during spinal manipulation (SM) influence proprioceptive function, which is often impaired in patients with CLBP. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a single SM intervention on lumbar proprioceptive function and its potential relationship with analgesic effects in patients with CLBP. In a single-blind randomized controlled trial, data from 142 adults with or without CLBP were analyzed after random assignment to receive lumbar spinal manipulation (LMANIP), lumbar mobilization (LMOB), or no intervention (NI). The primary outcome was the proprioceptive weighting (PW) ratio, which reflects the central nervous system’s preferred source of proprioceptive input for balance control, specifically from the lumbar and ankle muscles. PW ratios were assessed immediately before and after intervention by analyzing postural sway changes during vibrotactile stimulation (60 Hz). PW changed in both healthy participants and patients after the intervention, with a significantly stronger lumbar-steered PW following LMANIP compared to NI (β = − 0.047, t(422) = − 2.71, p = 0.007) and LMOB (β = − 0.039, t(422) = − 2.17, p = 0.030). Moreover, LMANIP was particularly effective in reducing pain in patients with stronger lumbar-steered PW before intervention (p < 0.017). These findings suggest that a single SM session enhances proprioceptive input from the lumbar muscles and that the strength of the analgesic effect is associated with the baseline PW status.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), Universitätsklinik Balgrist (CH), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
European Centre for Chiropractic Research Excellence, Balgrist Stiftung, Universiteit Hasselt
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.