Post-fire rehabilitation of reinforced concrete columns: effectiveness of ferrocement jacketing under different cooling regimes

Abstract Fire exposure severely reduces the strength of reinforced concrete (RC) columns, with residual performance strongly influenced by cooling regimes. This study examined 27 columns subjected to 150–600 °C, cooled in air or water, and retrofitted with ferrocement jacketing using locally available materials. Results showed that air cooling preserved higher residual strength than water quenching, while ferrocement jacketing restored up to approximately 80% of original capacity at 150 °C (air cooled) and about 50% under water cooling. At 300–450 °C, retrofitting improved ductility and delayed failure but only partially recovered strength, and at 600 °C, recovery was limited to deformation capacity. Comparative analysis with FRP, steel, and concrete jacketing from previous studies highlights ferrocement’s advantages of low cost, ease of application, and local adaptability, making it a viable rehabilitation strategy for moderate fire damage, though advanced systems may be required for severe exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00814-6
Primary Topic
Fire effects on concrete materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-fire rehabilitation of reinforced concrete columns: effectiveness of ferrocement jacketing under different cooling regimes

Sumaya Tabassum, Taj Noor -E- Yeasmin
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Fire effects on concrete materials
article

Post-fire rehabilitation of reinforced concrete columns: effectiveness of ferrocement jacketing under different cooling regimes

Sumaya Tabassum, Taj Noor -E- Yeasmin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Fire exposure severely reduces the strength of reinforced concrete (RC) columns, with residual performance strongly influenced by cooling regimes. This study examined 27 columns subjected to 150–600 °C, cooled in air or water, and retrofitted with ferrocement jacketing using locally available materials. Results showed that air cooling preserved higher residual strength than water quenching, while ferrocement jacketing restored up to approximately 80% of original capacity at 150 °C (air cooled) and about 50% under water cooling. At 300–450 °C, retrofitting improved ductility and delayed failure but only partially recovered strength, and at 600 °C, recovery was limited to deformation capacity. Comparative analysis with FRP, steel, and concrete jacketing from previous studies highlights ferrocement’s advantages of low cost, ease of application, and local adaptability, making it a viable rehabilitation strategy for moderate fire damage, though advanced systems may be required for severe exposure.

Journal of Engineering and Applied ScienceVol. 72(1)
Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology (BD), University of Rajshahi (BD)
Rajshahi University
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Fire effects on concrete materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.